from Nodal Point of Thought 2021-07-03 brainstorming

  • brainstorming Related stories, I don’t have it all together in a way that I can tell people right away.
  • Brainstorming began with “people gathering in a room to verbally waiver and a record keeper recording all ideas.
  • With the advent of computers, it was argued that doing it orally was inefficient.
  • Research results accumulated to show that the Nominal Group Technique, in which each person writes his or her opinion independently in advance of the discussion, is better.
  • Personally, I don’t share much sympathy for this kind of research.
    • On the “not much difference when there are six people, but there is a difference when there are twelve” kind of result
      • There’s a sense that you shouldn’t be brainstorming with that many people in the first place.
        • 2 pizza rule: the idea that the maximum number of meeting participants should be 5-7
      • I think in my own experience, the brainstorms that have yielded good results are often two or three people.
    • Research tends to be good or bad based on the amount of new ideas
  • Not in the direction of “good idea generation methods” but in the direction of “good communication methods” or something like that.
    • Participant Satisfaction
      • Making the most of your creativity p.273
      • If the idea is adopted, report it to the people at the meeting and encourage them

      • Distribute a brief letter of appreciation from the beneficiaries of the proposal to all


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăƒ–ăƒŹă‚€ăƒłă‚čăƒˆăƒŒăƒŸăƒłă‚° using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.