from Diary 2023-06-06 Parallelism of individuals, not management of multiple people
nishio Management in Volunteer Organizations is difficult because, unlike companies, there is no compelling force of command and order based on contract of employment. I wondered how they do it, but I found out that they do not manage âseveral peopleâ but âparallelâ management of each person by ânot discussingâ, âthe person who wants to do itâ, and âdeciding the time for the next meetingâ. I thought, âI see.
nishio This form can prevent the phenomenon of waiting for communication or âsocial cut cornersâ or miscommunication causing the ball to drop between. This form can prevent the phenomena of waiting for communication, âsocial cut cornersâ, and miscommunication. Next time, it will be âhow to assembleâ and âhow to improveâ by arranging the deliverables from those who want to put out, and it will be content management, not people management. The level of experience is evident.
- brainstorming creates [a feeling of being heard
- How to take specific actions
- Top-down decisions and assignments donât work. - volunteer So. - Because the chairman is not the boss with the right to command. - Enthusiasm for action must come from within the individual.
- The basic premise is that you canât create voluntary motivation in people who donât have it.
- All we can do is reduce the opportunity for motivation to be compromised.
- So task is not decided first.
- The task is clarified posterior by the âspontaneous motivationâ that emerges.
- Related: Enthusiasm is a valuable resource.
- Specifically.
- Clarify the date and time of the next meeting.
- Those who want to do â
,â make â,â and bring it back by next time.â- Create an online venue for asynchronous sharing
- Clarify that âbringingâ means creating a page there.
- The person who brings it will be the leader, and those who want to join will brush up on it.â
- When you make it, you automatically become a âleaderâ.
- Makes it harder to throw out.
- [creates a sense of responsibility
- Depending on the state of the members, itâs possible that no one will bring it.
- Visualize that everyone is âsomeone who wants to be irresponsible and have an opinion, but doesnât want to be a leaderâ.
- Iâm guessing youâre going to guess that in this case, there will be more than one case.
- Makes it harder to throw out.
- If you donât make it, youâre considered to have come down voluntarily.
- When you make it, you automatically become a âleaderâ.
@yasulab: @nishio I totally sympathize! (CoderDojo Japan also has regular meetings and the way they work is basically the same! đ đ
âWhoever wants to do it will do itâ and âSet the next time.â ⊠It becomes âhow to assembleâ and âhow to improveâ by arranging the deliverables produced by those who want to produce them, and it becomes content management rather than people management.
@satoru_takeuchi: @nishio Iâve done a few things, like âforget about things that no one doesâ and âif critical If critical tasks donât progress, the community disappears (leaders donât try too hard).
@takahashim: @nishio This may not fall between the two, but something on the critical path may not meet the deadline! âŠIâm wondering if itâs a question of how to avoid burnout and increased load on certain people when trying to manage that.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/è€æ°äșșăźăăăžăĄăłăă§ăŻăȘăćă äșșăźäžŠć using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.