Two before several.

There are various proposals for group flow, brainstorming, and other methods of multi-person knowledge creation, but based on the principle of “[The more people you have, the harder it is to control. However, based on the principle that “the more people you have, the harder it is to control,” the most controllable “multiple people” are “two people,” so it would be better to first establish a firm footing on how to conduct “Knowledge Creation through Dialogue” before thinking about a multi-person approach. I think it would be a good idea.

• For now, it’s interesting to think of the various methods as “what would happen if I used them in a dialogue between myself and one person who doesn’t know the method?” It is interesting to think about it.

• I think the problem of “People who don’t speak up are present” is less likely to occur in brainstorming sessions, when it’s one-on-one.

• Tokoroten: I tried brainwriting the other day and it solved all those problems and did pretty well. https://www.facebook.com/nishiohirokazu/posts/10203216483029430 #Knowledge Creation #1 person → 2 persons → Entire #Social corner-cutting

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/複数人の前に2人 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.