- Mistakenly thinks there are two [[options]] when there are not, and tries to choose one or the other.
- Not trying to find a third option.
- The quality of decision making is 7.7 times better when there are two choices versus three choices. see [[Quantity of choices and quality of decision making]].
- [[opposition]] Mistaking what is not for opposition.
- He says, "A or B."
    - Isn't there an option for "both?"
    - What about the "combination" option?
- With regard to planning, "both" is often interpreted as "do both" and then cut down to "it's not cost-effective".
    - It's "impossible to do both or neither", not exclusion.
    - Lack of ingenuity in how they are combined.
- There are many ways to combine them.
    - Example
        - Value Passing or Reference Passing? Passing by reference? → Passing by reference by value
        - Regression? Classification? →Solve classification problems by using regression to find the probability of entering a class.
            - see  [[Is logistic regression regression or classification?]]
- By assuming that they are antithetical, the two options are mistakenly thought to be "[[confrontation]]"
    - This often leads to conflicts, especially in multi-person organizations, with separate groups pushing each option.
    - Visualizing and trying to resolve this is [[Conflict Resolution Diagram]].

Thinking Patterns to Resolve - Isn’t there a third one?


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/誤った二者択一 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.