When you’re thinking about interaction between two parties, there’s actually a third character.

The composition is similar to choosing the wrong two options in that it is “assuming there are two, but there may be a third.” It falls into the Wrong 2 series, but “wrong two-party interaction” could be interpreted in a different way.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/侉ç•Ș盟た登栎äșș物 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.