If a metaphor is heavily developed within a metaphor space (lots of Networks between concepts), it can have the effect of providing a warp portal to other spaces, facilitating the joining of distant ones
-
knowledge network, I sense a difference in nuance.
-
There is a nuance of “objective” implicit in “knowledge”.
-
What is being discussed here is subjective Weltanschauung (philosophy), world view, world description.
- Uexküll’s Ringworld Theory
- Associative Networks is closer.
- What suggestion is the situation is connected by “recollection” and “virtual viewing” of the world.
- For example, right now the reader here has “drop and break” connected to “glass cup”.
- But in the future, people living in zero-gravity or low-gravity colonies will not connect this association because they can retrieve it before it cracks.
- Even in a world where unbreakable plastic cups dominate history and “glass cups” are only found in museums, the associations don’t connect.
- Related: Understanding as the ability to predict the future.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/概念間のネットワーク using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.