- In the age of transfinite warfare, revolution cannot be “plainly violent.
- transfinite warfare
- A form of war emerged that was not “plain and violent.”
- Revolution cannot be “plain and violent” in that era.
- Changes in the structure of resource distribution lead to changes in governance structures
- The present democracy cannot be the final form.
- Revolutions always happen, but not in a straightforward manner.
- Revolution takes sovereignty away from the current sovereign.
- From whom to take and to whom to distribute.
- Looking at the current situation in Japan, they will take away the right to vote from the elderly and give more voting rights to the young in proportion to their remaining life expectancy, or give the right to vote to households raising children as well as to their children.
- How to take away
- How to neutralize resistance
- From whom to take and to whom to distribute.
relevance - mobile voting - The social network that keeps escaping - Disengagement, Statement, and Loyalty
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/超限戦の時代に革命がわかりやすく暴力的な訳がない using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.