from Owase 2024-01-23~24
-
nishio note: realistic implementation of QV/QF is an approximation of a mathematical model, but it needs to be a tool that people can really use. When I mention that the realistic implementation of QV/QF is an approximation of a mathematical model, and that the UI needs to be improved in order for it to become a tool that people can really use, I get responses like “add sliders? I think that putting a slider is “a bad UI that exposes the square root to the user”.
-
nishio The only people who are happy to expose internal mechanisms to users are those who want to develop new internal mechanisms and those who find value in the fact that they are new. The majority of people in the world are not interested in internal mechanisms, but are motivated by practical benefits. (Difference between early adopter and majority)
-
0xtkgshn I don’t think I need the slider.
- In fact, if we want all citizens to participate, the end result islaggard の対応が必要になる
- Is the marketing strategy for early adopters “gaudiness” (positive meaning)?
- Marketing Strategies by Stage: Selective Marital Status and Innovator Theory.
- Is the marketing strategy for early adopters “gaudiness” (positive meaning)?
Summary of the trigger story: QV is a meaningful mechanism for not voting.
This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/Quadratic VotingのUIの工夫](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/Quadratic VotingのUIの工夫) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.