Re: I still have a hard time with (Internet) chat where I can’t derailment. from [/villagepump/It’s still hard to chat when you can’t derail the conversation](https://scrapbox.io/villagepump/It’s still hard to chat when you can’t derail the conversation). - Do you think turn-based communication can also be topic parallel? - think/villagepump/nishio.icon - Turns in a turn system have correspondence to very large turns. - In correspondence, you write and send all the topics you want to write about, and they write and send all the topics they want to write about, so the topics are parallel. - The decision to communicate with others and the rules that are somehow determined by the atmosphere determine what can and cannot be done. - Only valid under limited conditions/villagepump/基素.icon - For example, I’ve established a topic in a long sentence on line, but not many people can do it. - We need a careful way to read and answer each one. - I wonder if I should vote not to think this way./villagepump/基素.icon - I don’t think/villagepump/増井俊之.icon/villagepump/kuuote.icon/villagepump/Mijinko_SD.icon - vim-jpでみた/villagepump/takker.icon - honestly speaking, it’s hard./villagepump/kuuote.icon

  • What is considered “doable” seems to vary from person to person./villagepump/sta.icon

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/話題並列 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.