sense of understanding

from [/inteltank/training-creation-toramaki by Sawachin](https://scrapbox.io/inteltank/training-creation-toramaki by Sawachin).

• In training content, it is better to use “number of questions asked” as a KPI rather than “satisfaction at the end of the training”. - (degree of) satisfaction does not correlate with training outcomes - Even if participants are satisfied… it doesn’t mean that they are “growing in skills” or “knowledge”. - Instead, by using satisfaction as a KPI, only a sense of understanding is generated, and people who “can’t do it at all when they actually try it” are created. - [People perceive uncomplicated things as easy to understand, so “easy-to-understand content” often omits many “necessary but difficult-to-understand elements” to create an easy-to-understand story. - Too much is left out, and the result is only a sense of understanding. - Contents similar to “/nishio/ understanding” and others are described from various angles.

number of questions.

• Incorrect KPI setting

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/わかった感 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.