power and modes of exchange

• Amazon
• English title: Power and Modes of Exchange

  • Yukito Emaya

  • interchange format A story that discussed A-D, and after delving into D, thought that A-C should also be delved into, and came back to “power”.

  • Transcritique (1990)

    • Seeing World History from the Perspective of Modes of Exchange” and “The Birth of Mode of Exchange D, which is Recovery at a Higher Level of Mode of Exchange A,” described below.
    • Structure of World History (2010)
    • Reimagining World History by Introducing the Concept of “Modes of Exchange.”
      • Das Kapital
    • Transition from production style to exchange style.
      • Marx thought that the mode of production was the economic substructure and that changing it would change the ideological superstructure of the state, but it did not
      • As a result, the idea that the conceptual superstructure of the state is independent of the substructure was strengthened.
      • Neither is correct. Karatani’s argument is that the economic substructure is not a “mode of production” but a “mode of exchange.
    • Exchange Form D, which is “recovery at a higher level of Exchange Form A.”
      • To return to A after experiencing exchange form C.
    • The mini-world system created by reciprocity of Exchange Form A becomes the universal republic of Kant by [Exchange Form D
      • The state is gone eternal peace. - For Eternal Peace
      • donation of a right of belligerency

  • D study (2015-2016)

  • Power and Exchange Style (2022)

    • I thought about the “conceptual power” of the exchange style.
    • A: spell power.
    • B: authority
    • C: capital power.
    • D: Their combined “power
    • Read “Power and Exchange Styles” by Yukito Karatani (2023)

- Traditionally, when people overcooked vegetables and food, they would "[[share]]" them. - In return for this is the exchange form A - As for digital goods, the cost of copying is low, so you can make what you want and then "share" it with the rest of the world. - This is the occurrence of [OSS - However, in the modern era, when [[exchange form C]], the exchange of goods, is common, there is no "giving back" based on exchange form A to the author of the OSS - In other words, the problem can be described as "the dysfunction of Mode of Exchange A in a society where Mode of Exchange C is the norm. - So Form D, which is "to experience Form C and then return to the higher A," is the solution. - Related: [[How to deal with the tragedy of shared lands in OSS]].

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/力と交換様式 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.