from [/villagepump/existent nonexistent type conflict](https://scrapbox.io/villagepump/existent nonexistent type conflict).
I found a common pattern and gave it a name.
Case 1
- [/villagepump/ isn’t that Japanese enough?62748c677838e300007e2688](https://scrapbox.io/villagepump/ isn’t that Japanese enough?62748c677838e300007e2688)
factor : Factors When I use the word “factor”, I recognize it as a word strongly associated with refactoring, so when it is rewritten as “factor”, that link is severed and I feel uncomfortable.
I don’t associate refactoring with the >factor.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/refactor
re- + factor It may be difficult to understand when written in katakana, but the stem is “factor” and “ing” is added after it.
I have never seen the word refactor (in English or Japanese)
Case 2
TV Drama.Koumon Mito で「殺陣の前にさっさと印籠を出して控えさせればよいのでは？」というようなことがよく聞かれる。
No, I don’t think there are many people who would ask such a question nowadays.
I’m asked when I mention Mito Komon as a topic.
common pattern
-
-
Mr. A sees that X is included in his observation range and says “X exists”.
-
Mr. B says “X does not exist” because his observation range does not include X consideration
-
This has nothing to do with the overall size of each Observation range (so it is best to avoid using the expression “Narrow observation range”).
- Reverse pattern of “[Learn from those with little knowledge.
-
If both parties express “X exists/not exists in my observation range” without omission, then Both claims can be True..
-
The bug that confuses the subjective with the objective. #Discussion Patterns
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/存在するしない対立 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.