-
Response to [Optimizing the allocation of time for learning Facebook
-
tokoroten >I feel much differently about this, it is still Winner take all (WTA), and becoming a Winner involves luck, so you can get on stage when your utility is satiated, and from there on out you become a Winner by luck. It is like having many sachi axes, the combination of sachi axes will be evaluated by luck.
- The model of luck after utility is satiated is seen in Oikonomia’s “Economics: Is Life Luck or Effort?” in Oikonomia.
- The bottom line is probably “Successful people make (by) chance their ally.”
-
tokoroten> To be honest, I don’t have much skill, so it’s multi-skill + luck.
- Niche Contingent Expansion Strategy] from Niche Top Strategy for Cross-fertilization with multi-skills
-
Luck, after the axis is satiated, is the only way to go. - [A model where only the top players in the market get utility.
- However, this graph is ambiguous in that the vertical axis is utility
- I think there is an S-shape relationship between time invested and skills, with requirements such as WTA and cross-fertilization to price knowledge workers in the market.
utilityluck
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/効用がサチってから運 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.