-
There are types of things that are obvious to those who have personal experience, but not to those who have not experienced them.
-
There are values that make it a good idea to convince people who haven’t experienced it with words.
-
However,
- If there is agreement among those who have experienced it that it is self-evident,
- To insist that people who have not experienced it should be convinced by words.
- You are claiming, “I don’t pay Cost of Experience, but the experiencer should pay Cost of Linguization for me.”
-
To think it is reasonable implicitly assumes that “the cost of verbalization is much cheaper than the cost of experience.”
- This assumption is not necessarily correct.
-
Values based on this false assumption give birth to a bias that “what is easy to verbalize is privileged.”
relevance - Introduce axioms founded by experience - Grounding through experience - Introduced axiom, which was foundation by experience
For example, we experience gravity from the time we are born, so we do not question that “things are pulled down by an invisible force and move by themselves.” However, people born and raised in zero-gravity space may ask, “Objects move by an invisible force without even touching them? Why?” How would they respond if we asked them the question, “Why?
orthographical variants - Experience reveals
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/体験的に自明 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.