-
The term Task Management is ambiguous and has at least two meanings. It means to “manage what a clear task looks like” and to “Crystallize Tasks” out of the mumbo-jumbo that is not yet clear.
- There are two types of what is called Task Management.
- Task progress ・Resource management
- Task Status Management
- Dedicated tools are better.
- Scrapbox is not designed for it.
- How to do it with Scrapbox - The status display to be updated should be a pictogram at the beginning of the title.
- Dedicated tools are better.
- Thinking about the task itself
- What is the problem and how to solve it
- I prefer Scrapbox.
- why?
- [There are so many things involved that you have to write them down and look at them.
- Inconvenient for tools that assume one-dimensional communication
- It’s the same story here, that state management tools for tasks (things that have been decided what to do and how to do it) don’t fit because they are not designed to support the process of deciding “what to do”. [/nota-techconf/Day2 Questions and Chat Corner#6048acd579d3a900009a6181](https://scrapbox.io/nota-techconf/Day2 Questions and Chat Corner#6048acd579d3a900009a6181)
- why?
For task management Two types.. relevance - There are two kinds of plans
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/タスク管理には2種類ある using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.