The argument that X is useful.

I realize that I agree with the assertion that “Eastern philosophy is useful in the age of AI,” but I don’t think it’s useful.

To someone who is familiar with Eastern philosophy, it appears to be “an ambiguous statement that puts diverse things in a miscellaneous box. To those who are not familiar with Eastern philosophy, it appears to be a “statement without substance.

We need to choose the appropriate explanation for their situation. In many cases, the bracket “Eastern philosophy” is too vague. It is a low resolution statement.

relevance - teaching Buddhism through the use of dialogue - Low resolution - They put it in a jar and mix it up.

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/Xが有用だ論 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.