-
T: I’m catching a glimpse of N’s sociality.
-
N: Madamis (Japanese brand of haloperidol) (Murder Mysteries) I’ve been doing it for about 6 months now? It’s possible my social skills are growing fast.
-
T: That’s interesting! Because you’re playing someone you’re not?
-
N: Because guess what’s inside others is usually off but only on during madamis?
- Related: Air reading function is normally off….
-
T: Is Madamis effective as a training to turn that switch on…!
- This is about the most interesting fact of the year for me personally.
- A realization that Madamis’ play might be useful for something. The faint ones that seem to disappear if you don’t highlight them…
- I’m not good at reading the air” - “Then do madamis” might be a possibility…
-
N: How is it from your point of view, T? Are you growing up?
-
T: That’s right, I do.
-
N: Which areas did you feel you have grown in?
-
T: The apparent increase in references such as “I heard that Fatty did that.
- If you’re doing madamis, it’s probably something you do naturally as a game, but maybe it’s good training for those who don’t usually do it.
relevance - Air-reading is not a zero-factor. - Air reading function is normally off.
It may also be important to play someone you’re not.
-
Not by itself, but by the experience of “playing someone who is not you” in a wide variety of ways to get food for thought?
-
The typification of a character’s thinking is sometimes referred to as “meta-reasoning” or other images in the Madamisian sense.
- Typically, there is A “someone carrying out a murder and trying to cover it up” and B “someone trying to find the killer”.
- But there are also C “people who think they carried out the murder but didn’t actually kill the person”, D “people who are not aware that they carried out the murder but directly caused the death”, E “people who are not the murderer but are trying to defend the murderer”, and F “people who are trying to defend the murderer but the other person is not the murderer
- G. There are “people who are not interested in identifying the culprit, but have other goals.
- G is a guess of intent.
- Is “trying to protect the culprit” also an inference of intent?
- As I was writing C-F, I kept coming up with more and more, but this is false belief issue.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/マダミスで社会性が成長する using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.