Scrapbox and LLM compatibility

I’ve heard people who have been exposed to LLM on ChatGPT and elsewhere say that they feel it works well with Scrapbox, and I think the same, but I’ve never been able to verbalize why that is.

• 1: Many people have an image of writing
  • Blog posts, etc.
• 2: There are several “parts” in it
  • Instead of seeing a single sentence as a chunk of text, feel that there are multiple parts that could be independent pages
• 3: Considering the relationship between these parts, the one-dimensional arrangement in 2 seems “different” in the first place.
  • In the diagram, the structure is now “A and B supporting C.”
• 4: Each part connects with another to create another structure.
  • It’s hard to develop this kind of development with the way one writes.

relevance - Scrapbox and the use of knowledge representation and permalinks in books - > Nishio’s Scrapbox has a small granularity of entries, like a fragmented scrapbook of notes, but it’s easy to absorb knowledge. - give rise to

• @nishio: Creating knowledge packages is actually easier than creating documents for human readers. Because humans have limited short-term memory, we need to give knowledge in a “good order”, which is very hard for the author, but when giving it to LLM, the order is irrelevant, so just write whatever comes to your mind!

  • I thought, “That’s Scrapbox.”

    • High cost of one dimensionality

  • Search “in” Scrapbox

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ScrapboxとLLMの相性の良さ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.