shoya140: The dilemma is that “I want to support proposal capabilities such as commenting on proposals before they are submitted,” but “proposals I commented on cannot be evaluated fairly. If we divide the proposals into “Unexplored Junior Red/Green”, we may be able to support each other without getting involved in the selection process…?
- relevance - Need support for proposal capacity. - Mentors who have reviewed proposals in advance cannot be involved in the review process.
nishio: if we stagger it by half a year two-term system, we can support the proposal without worrying about review. Three-phase AC is also acceptable.
shoya140: I would like to think about what would happen if we had a two term system. I was also thinking of splitting the mentors into two groups only at the time of recruitment, so that applicants can get comments instead of waiving adoption from one of them.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/未踏ジュニアを二期制にする案 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.