from Diary 2023-05-24 Politics is moving what you canât fork.
@0xtkgshn: âFolks, it is politics that moves what cannot be movedâ theory, firmly traced in the same context in â [Disengagement, Statement, and Loyaltyâ. Disengagement, Statement, and Loyalty]â. If there are enough options, withdrawal is chosen, but if not, proposal has to be made. This is also the same as Carl Schmidtâs Friendly Theory of what politics is. @0xtkgshn: in a scenario where cooperative game does not exist, the concept of governance is meaningless @0xtkgshn: related: neocameralism, Snow Crash, federalism, mobile voting, Panarchy. @0xtkgshn: that makes me think that highly skilled people who can make their own choices can choose as immigration, but those who donât Those who donât may not be able to take the âleaveâ option and âspeak upâ. In the past, politics may have occurred because liquidity was lower, but now feedback (meaning speaking up) is not working. @0xtkgshn: >The customers who are most interested in the quality of the product, and thus should be the most active, reliable, and creative actors in the statements, That is why they are also the customers most likely to be the first to leave if quality declines.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăă©ăŒăŻă§ăăȘăăăźăćăăăźăæżæČ» using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.