from Diary 2023-05-24 Politics is moving what you can’t fork.

@0xtkgshn: “Folks, it is politics that moves what cannot be moved” theory, firmly traced in the same context in ” [Disengagement, Statement, and Loyalty”. Disengagement, Statement, and Loyalty]“. If there are enough options, withdrawal is chosen, but if not, proposal has to be made. This is also the same as Carl Schmidt’s Friendly Theory of what politics is. @0xtkgshn: in a scenario where cooperative game does not exist, the concept of governance is meaningless @0xtkgshn: related: neocameralism, Snow Crash, federalism, mobile voting, Panarchy. @0xtkgshn: that makes me think that highly skilled people who can make their own choices can choose as immigration, but those who don’t Those who don’t may not be able to take the “leave” option and “speak up”. In the past, politics may have occurred because liquidity was lower, but now feedback (meaning speaking up) is not working. @0xtkgshn: >The customers who are most interested in the quality of the product, and thus should be the most active, reliable, and creative actors in the statements, That is why they are also the customers most likely to be the first to leave if quality declines.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăƒ•ă‚©ăƒŒă‚Żă§ăăȘă„ă‚‚ăźă‚’ć‹•ă‹ă™ăźăŒæ”żæČ» using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.