Phenomenology as an illogical stage

from Study Session 1 on “Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning

• phenomenology as illogical phase. The English version was published online.
• Phenomenology as non-logical steps

When talking to others

• Accept the whole person in that moment.
• I’ll try to use their words to describe it.
• Putting other things on the back burner in order to focus on one thing.
  • We don’t agree on everything.”
  • Any system can be clearly expressed (formalized) in terms of a single point.
• That “point” is not the same in relation to other things.
  • There’s another implication in the later part of the story.
  • The “different” is clear. So what is “the same”?
    • What in the world can be “that point” of “commonness” in terms of moving across several clear expressions (formulations)?
• That’s not a public commitment.
  • I mean it is not a common part.
  • A strange order reacting to various explicit expressions (formulations)
    • Converting expressions is a painstaking process
  • No single consistent pattern would be able to encompass the entirety of “the point”
• When something comes to mind, wait quietly until the words come out.
  • If you get interrupted in the middle, you forget even “exactly what you were going to say”.

Richard McKeon - Wikipedia - dialectics - functional pattern - reductionism - attributed to the fundamental unit

• Eugene Gendlin: “We should be able to cross all three.”

phenomenology

• Eugene Gendlin, “The Phenomenologist Had the Other Half of My Method.”
  • I knew that “a point” was a clear expression (formulation) of this.
    • I’d like to know the original.
  • Half of the three crossings, the other half being phenomenology.
  • Criticism that Sartre and the Hegelian school did not find what Merleau-Ponty found in “function” and “refinement”.
  • hussar
  • How “conflicted approach” can “lift
    • The “lifting” of “cessation” in dialectics.

Three.

• If you have three, you’re not “half”.
• Dilthey Wilhelm Dilthey - Wikipedia - Understanding is Creation
  • For Dilthey, the experience process is understanding
  • Understanding that we are created within
  • They are examples of what it is about, because individual advances can create more of the other
    • You’re talking about the IOFI principle.

https://1000ya.isis.ne.jp/1708.html Should I also explain Hegel’s story lightly? phenomenology Phenomenology - Wikipedia

• Hegel (1770 - 1831) published his work “mental phenomenology” dialectical phenomenology in 1807.
• Husserl (1859 - 1938) proposed transcendental phenomenology.
• Martin Heidegger (1889 - 1976) hermeneutic phenomenology.

Phenomenology is some kind of progress in the thinking stage

• Experience Process and Meaning Creation Raises Seven New Advances
  • I want to explain what this is.

Carl Rogers

• How new consciousness can be collated against organismic experience to validate emerging oppressions
  • He “searched for the corresponding truth.”
• Eugene Gendlin.
  • another way
    • Instead of looking for certain experiences prior to symbolization
    • Several steps
      • It became the “Experience Process Scale.”

Carl Rogers

• On becoming a Person

Steps Teaching Method

• Now called Focusing.

• Psychotherapy is failing to teach how to do it.

• Prefer to give expertise

• Csikszentmihalyi

• For me, Chicxent Mihai (China) is more appropriate.

• Questions about things

  • Die Frage nach dem Ding.: Heidegger,
  • The Question Concerning the Thing: On Kant’s Doctrine of the Transcendental Principles (New Heidegger Research)
    • You write that Heidegger thanked you with a nice afterword.
  • “What Is a Thing?”
    • Amazon

    • by Martin Heidegger (Author), W. B. Barton Jr. (Translator), Vera Deutsch (Translator), Eugene T. Gendlin (Contributor)

    • Not this way?
  • The former, from the table of contents, looks like Eugene Gendlin won’t be showing up.

• Many philosophers are

• Avoiding physics for fear of bringing reductionism into philosophy

• Avoid bringing in psychology and avoid human experiential processes.

• Heidegger believed that everything had to be brought in.

  • I agree, and I think philosophers who want to create something of historical value in our time should study programming (polemic).
  • Statehood, not emotion
  • “Dwelling,” “statehood,” misunderstood.
  • Difficult to understand that “investiture” has meaning in “mood.”
  • Difficult to see that “home - thinking” is found and implemented
  • Heidegger left phenomenology and attributed events to “history”
    • As a result, the “phenomenon” has become inseparable from language and history.
    • Many people misinterpreted that as “every experience is an old idea.”
    • Heidegger believed that history occurs in “dwelling
    • Thinking-Dwelling.”

• Phenomena are not isolated; all experience is dependent

• Failure to assume that there is a neutral, uninterpreted “phenomenon”

  • It went on to assume that every experience derives entirely from an implicit assumption that can only be broken by discontinuity
    • I’m not sure, do you have the original text?

• Overlooking illogical transitions.

• When we understand exactly the complexity of the formation, when it transcends its form

  • When you don’t understand it, all you can do is quote it.
    • That’s me right now.
  • To understand is to “dwell - think” “within” the form
    • This is a more accurate understanding than “keeping” the formality
    • Shuhari I associate it with
      • When you don’t understand, all you can do is follow the pattern.
      • When understood accurately, the mold is broken.

• “Further -movement -seeking -order.”

  • No, I wanted this to be written in the original language.
  • ~ is intricate and complex rather than a consistent principle
  • Has more order (order) than formed form
    • Coercively accurate feedback

• process of experience

  • Richer and wiser than fixed forms
  • It’s called disorder.
  • It means both “no logical order”
    • The Dionysian Experience of [Nietzsche
    • More complex and sensible than the order formed
    • Disorganized, but working in an orderly fashion.
  • There is a higher order and a lower order.
    • Scrapbox’s apparent disorder may be a higher order.
      • The lower order here is, for example, “that the page is in a folder that represents its classification.”
      • Scrapbox is richer and smarter than fixed hierarchical classifications.”
      • I have a feeling you’re right.
  • Finding “internal” differences “toward a voluntary process.
  • derrida “movement”
  • It’s not arbitrary.
  • Individual movements end up as motionless contradictions.
  • He believes that the overthrow of order is disorder.

• When Dionysian experience works with pre-existing kinds of experience, it creates more order than ever before.

  • Not a mere lack of pre-existing order.
  • Nor is it the product of an order implicitly imposed and formed.

• Nietzsche’s Body-Knowledge, Scheleiermacher, Dilthey, Merleau-Ponty, Heidegger

  • This order can think and study itself, an intermittent reaffirmation of
  • Such thinking is not just fuzzy [felt sense
  • The work of understanding “precisely” transcends disconnection and form (distinctions and overall patterns).

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/非論理的段階としての現象学 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.