For example, in a dialogue between two people, as the dialogue progresses, things that have not been verbalized are verbalized, knowledge on both sides increases, and new insights are gained, so the later the richer the description of the world should be!
Chat logs and minutes in chronological order are good for reliving the passage of time in the process. But itâs not about â[Bring the important stuff first.
- Bringing important things first is a useful guideline for organizing information for re-reading
- People usually read from top to bottom, so if you put the important stuff at the top, you can adjust the time it takes to read according to demand, such as âI want to know roughly the important partsâ or âI want to know every detail.
- In other words, â[Just read as far as you want and stop.
What would happen, for example, if Kozaneba were to place them in reverse chronological order, starting with the newest statement?
impressions
- Kozaneba sorted out some of the words that were not mine, which were split into multiple posts.
- I didnât see a strong advantage to organizing in reverse order to the time line.
- What I thought was âimportantâ after organizing on Kozaneba does not match the âlast postâ before organizing.
- As I was sorting through it, I kept coming up with new insights.
- Especially when organizing the posts of multiple people, there are cases where some of the earlier appearing posts are quoted, in which case it is easier to do it if the âearlier postâ is kozane first.
- What I thought was âimportantâ after organizing on Kozaneba does not match the âlast postâ before organizing.
---log
1 2 3 The result of thinking about what fills in the gaps was âSituation = Purposeâ and âDoes the customer really want it? Expansion of the âSituation = Purposeâ and âDoes the customer really want it?
- 4
- Exploratory studiesâ came out of thinking about what fills the gap between the left and the middle, and âdefensive studiesâ came out as a result of a close-up against exploration.
- Awareness during Kozaneba
- exploration studies
-
After the announcement of the KJ method, Jiro Kawakita started calling it exploratory studies, because after all, if the preliminary steps to do the KJ method are not methodologized, it is a problem before creating new structures with the KJ method.
-
- Shuhari
-
The most accessible exploration for the modern working person is the reading of documents that are not land-based, which is the first step in internalizing Existing Structure, so it does not match the method of suddenly discarding all structure.
-
Jiro Kawakita also collects data through fieldwork = exploration
-
There is a process of exploration in the foreground.
-
The premise is that the âMamoruâ part of the âShi-Ba-Riâ (protection and separation) has been completed,
-
In order to get from that state to detachment, we need to break free of the existing structure.
-
It is not beneficial to suddenly do a rupture.
-
- exploration studies
- Awareness during Kozaneba
- What fills the gap between middle and right?
- âA realization during Kozaneba: âThe customer is a modern working person.â
- This wasnât said in the form of a short phrase, but itâs an important piece.
-
- revision
-
because our customers are modern working people.
-
Sensitive to cost/return relationship
-
Requires a small cost to be put in before the first return is observed
-
More valuable than creating an entirely new structure is understanding the existing structure and discovering the link that says, âIf you do this action, you kill two birds with one stone.
-
Why is this?
-
âUnlike individual entrepreneurial researchers, teamwork in an organization often requires understanding by other members during the action implementation phase, and new structures independent of existing structures are often aborted due to the high cost of understanding and the inability to generate it.
-
- revision
- âA realization during Kozaneba: âThe customer is a modern working person.â
5
- This is a related but separate branch of the story, so it doesnât connect well with the others at this time.
- Awareness during Kozaneba
- 1
-
When I documented the process and looked back on it, I found myself asking the question, âWhat fills in the gaps?â I found that I was unconsciously asking the question âWhat fills in the gaps?
-
When I first recorded it, I only wrote âadditionsâ (new things related to the subject appeared in the process of organizing the subject, so I added them to the subject), but when thatâs occurring, thereâs usually a connection made between the separate groups.
-
- 2
-
I notice a deficiency when I try to describe the relationship between them.
-
You donât know it, but youâre writing it.
-
- 1
6
7 8
9
10 11 12
13
merge
- before
- after
14
- 15
- merged
16
17
18
19
20
- I went back to the beginning of the story.
- 1
-
It is difficult to create a new structure when there is an existing structure âwhen expressing a relationship in proximityâ.
-
This is because âmovingâ is immediately âdestroying existing structures,â and âexisting structures that are being brokenâ and ânew structures that are being createdâ are expressed as a whole without distinction.
-
In the process of using Kozaneba, I thought, âWouldnât it be better as a sample if Kozanebaâs release notes themselves were organized in Kozaneba?â I tried it, and even with my ability, it was impossible to âcreate a new structure from the data once structured in chronological order without shuffling the structure.
-
After thinking about why this was the case, we decided that it was wrong that the only way to express relationships was through proximity, so we added a line-drawing function.
-
- 2: It was September 2 Arrows are a way to express clear relationships and make them unbreakable.
- 3: Try to organize the release notes on Kozaneba on August 27 and say âno, because they are lumped by timeâ 6128546aaff09e00006ef934.
Iâd like to describe the relationship between the chunks that are still shredded from here.
-
It takes 2 seconds to render when grouping or something.
-
The total number of Kozaneya groups is just over 600.
-
on the way
-
data addition
-
Jiro Kawakita
-
Exploratory Studies of âKnowledgeâ From Research to Creation
-
Chapter 1: Why Interview Studies?
-
Section 4: Interview Studies as a New Bottleneck
-
Despite the fact that the KJ method is becoming popular on the surface, it still does not seem to be used in a serious way. There are some people who have mastered the KJ method on their own, but the examples of organizations making full use of it are still rarer than the stars of dawn. What is the bottleneck? If the quality of the original label data used for the KJ method is poor, the results will be irredeemable⌠It can be called interviewing or fieldwork. The methods and training for fieldwork are severely lacking in many workplaces.
- In the W-type problem-solving model, the KJ method in the narrow sense is C to D, but it is impossible to utilize the KJ method if the preceding steps A to C are not done properly.
-
p.78 Birth of Exploration Net
-
Brainstorming session recordings
-
Bullet points are not in harmony with the KJ method
-
I decided to write the theme in the center and write around it
-
Keep statements close in meaning.
-
I tried it and itâs a mess.
-
It would be clearer to draw a relevant line between the islands of the speech record.
-
Further islanding of similar statements and rough surface nameplate
-
-
In other words, youâre doing the KJ method, adding statements that came up during the brainstorming session as targets.
- fill in for the rest of the night
-
The KJ method described by Jiro Kawakita in his âIdea Methodâ in 1966, the relationship between stickies was expressed only by proximity in the group formation phase, and the relationship between distant ones was not done until the diagramming phase.
-
In 1977, in âExploratory Studies of Knowledge,â he stated that the information gathering phase before the KJ method is the new bottleneck.
-
One solution to that problem, described in âExplore Net,â states that proximity placement alone is insufficient for organization in the information gathering process, and that it is clearer to draw lines.
-
He also suggests doing 6 rounds of KJ method.
-
In other words, the reason why the relationship was expressed only by proximity without adding lines in the first half of the first round of the KJ method was not because they actively thought âno lines are betterâ but only because they emphasized free movement because it was difficult to achieve both âdrawing linesâ and âfree movementâ with the technology of the time.
-
I thought that drawing enclosures and lines to clarify the groups and the relationships between them, to the point of making them one-dimensional, was a round, and that it should be repeated, which means that I saw merit in having another phase to move them after the clarification of the relationships was done. Itâs just that at the time there was no way to move it again because it was written with a pen on a piece of imitation paper.
-
-
-
Awareness during Kozaneba
-
The irrefutable key point: âAt the time when Jiro Kawakita proposed the KJ method, it was difficult to simultaneously express information by moving sticky notes to any position and by proximity, and to express relationships among sticky notes by drawing lines between them or enclosing them in a box.
-
Kozaneba can do it.
-
If we say that this could not be done with the KJ method in a cursory manner, the objection would be âdone in the A-type diagramming phase,â so it is necessary to emphasize âto do at the same time. We couldnât do it at the same time, thatâs why we had separate phases.
-
-
The reason why we had to choose between abandoning the existing structure and not abandoning it, and the reason why âin order to obtain a new structure, we need to abandon the old one,â was because there was no method to make it compatible with the new structure.
-
Itâs all connected.
- https://kozaneba.netlify.app/#view=OIAUYkLkp1EO98Mfc7LB
- So, everything is connected, and this still retains the âin close proximity in the original sentenceâ relationship = existing structure.
- Now that we have this situation backed up, we can âreach the new structure without painful jumpsâ if we do ânot need to keep the original structureâ = âmove away from it, destroying the original structure so that the arrows connecting it are in close proximityâ.
- I wonder if this could be mechanically assisted⌠i.e. if the proximity is a weak spring, the arrow is a strong spring, and the physics is applied so that the arrow is the right lengthâŚ
- For the first time I thought I would like a â90 degree rotation of the selectionââŚ
- Hmmm, maybe we can shuffle it around (eh.
- It would be nice if we could back up the old Ba, copy and shuffle only what seems important (e.g. large kozanne, lined kozanne, groups with titles, etc.) to the new Ba, and if we want to know the context of the old Ba, we can follow the link and see it right away.
- No, itâs not. If what you didnât choose is not copied to the new Ba, the psychological cost of choosing is higher.
- If the structures of the past are hindering the new structures, maybe itâs time to fold them up.
- fill in for the rest of the night
- The KJ method is a method to create new structures by moving sticky notes, but many people find it difficult to create the sticky notes themselves, which are the material for the KJ method.
- Jiro Kawakita, who proposed the KJ method in âIdea Methodâ in 1966, stated in âExplorations in Knowledgeâ in 1977 that the process of gathering materials before the KJ method is a new bottleneck.
- In this book, Jiro Kawakita argued that the KJ method solves not only the problem of chaotic data, but also the problem of not having others understand what you want to say, and the problem of not being able to understand each other in a team.
- The resolution of this bottleneck is useful independently of the KJ method.
- For example, âinternal explorationâ transforms âsomething bothering meâ in the mind into a form of âsticky note. This makes the fuzziness in the mind into an indelible object called a sticky note, which can be observed and manipulated from a third-party point of view. The importance of organizing the fuzziness and creating a story that can be conveyed to others is increasing with the development of groupware that communicates through text.
- So, weâve come to the point where âMoya Moya â Storyâ is beneficial.
- The parallel would be that âExploratory Studies â KJ methodâ and âKeichobot â Kozanebaâ as a way to realize this. Then, âKozaneba is not a tool to do KJ method, so it does not have to follow the manner of KJ method, and the quality of the method should be judged based on whether it produces stories and its cost effectiveness.
- Why is it important to create stories? Because we need to communicate to others what we feel is important and elicit empathy in order to realize a society full of teamwork!
-
- When creating a story from the illustrations on Kozaneba, the story should be selected according to the audience and the message to be conveyed, so that several stories can be created from a single illustration.
- Hereâs why: when the goal is to âtell a story and gain empathy,â brevity is more powerful.
- You make the whole thing one-dimensional because the KJ method is not about conveying a message, but about gaining new insights by changing the format.
- Why did you say that the story is different for each recipient?
- At first I thought âwe need a story for people who are looking at Kozaneba from the perspective of the KJ method,â but then I thought maybe thatâs not such a high priority. I realized that itâs not such a high priority.
- Most people in the world either donât know about the KJ method or only understand it as âmoving sticky notes,â so even assuming knowledge of the diagramming or writing phases, they donât get it.
- Two important ones are
- 1: Stories that convince the world of Kozanebaâs usefulness to them.
- 2: Stories that convince Cybozu people of Kozanebaâs usefulness in achieving Cybozuâs vision.
- When creating a story from the illustrations on Kozaneba, the story should be selected according to the audience and the message to be conveyed, so that several stories can be created from a single illustration.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ćé蝸éé ăŽć´ç using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.