Open Office Hours 2023-07-06

Mr. Motoshima https://twitter.com/origin_study

Areas with high profitability will have free competition and autonomous social decision-making. What areas are not profitable? - tax and CSR came in.

• There is a bias in the stakeholders involved in decision making.
• Can we make some kind of improvement?
  • Financial indicators?

Providing People

• Provide people from large companies
  • People who don’t have what they want to do, who are not motivated, who don’t have the mindset? People who don’t have the
  • Have them work a little in areas that don’t make money but are beneficial to society.
  • Because you can’t design that kind of thing. - loan deal を連想した
• Nomura Research Institute and Miyoshi City, Tokushima Prefecture case study?
• What specific resources are distributed by this activity?
  • Where appreciation is gained for the individual.
  • They don’t get the thanks they deserve in big business.
    • Because they are far away from the beneficiaries of the benefits they generate, it is difficult for them to feel that their activities are creating happy people in society.
    • Working in close proximity to beneficiaries makes it easier for them to understand the benefits of working and gives them motivation.
    • The company that seconds the employees to the company wants employees who are enthusiastic by it.

DAO’s Challenge

• social common capital
• We’re getting a lot of helpful approaches.
• Especially when people who have cryptocurrency assets put up money to ~.
• Incentive Design
  • I’ll have a billion dollars put in and try it out.

Self-introduction by each member

• Mr. Snazuka.
  • verifiable credentials
  • Impact Evaluation
• Mount Igarashi.
  • Data analysis for financial institutions
  • impact investment
• Mrs. Abe.
  • verifiable credentials、 distributed ID
  • Accumulation of proof
  • Companies are beginning to take an interest in the form of national policy.
• Mr. Iijima.
  • https://twitter.com/umakunaihouno
  • Distribute points within the community.
    • contributor
    • People who spread the word
    • Wallet
      • You need to install MetaMask to receive it.
      • Resolved by [acount abstruction
        • Contract Wallet?
• Takagi.
  • Hongo Web 3 Valley?
    • The University of Tokyo Circle
• (inaudible)
  • Synergies between DAOs and rural areas
    • Axis of value not capitalism
    • A Better Way of Life for Human Beings
• west end
  • I’m not familiar with Web3 or DAO.
  • Why were you called here?

  • @nishio: Both DeCartography and Polis can be viewed as systems that create value by collecting the subjective opinions of many people in a certain format. Polis has no means of distributing the “value” to the participants, while DeCartography tries to create a means of distribution.

    • Sunazuka-san saw this and shared it on Discord, and Motoshima-san said, “We’re connected on Twitter,” and approached me via DM.
    • I see!
  • Impact is “good for society”
    • The scale to measure this is the problem.
    • CO2 reductions and so on.
      • Is this really the appropriate scale?
    • A bias that, by attempting to create an objective measure, leads to the selection of indicators that are easier to objectively measure at this point in time.
      • Incorrect KPI setting derails decision making.
    • On the contrary, I am interested in DeCartography, Polis, and Plurality by trying to unite the subjectivity of many.

Grants from [Gitcoin

• good plan
• But focus on the PUBLIC GOOD on the digital
• Can we create a scheme that replaces the real world PUBLIC GOOD?
• For companies that make a profit from Web3, there is a profit in the development of the Web3 ecosystem, so they invest in public goods to enrich the Web3 world.
  • The question is how to bring it to our world.
  • Create incentives by tweaking the tax system?
  • It is a scheme that works for existing NPOs and public corporations, so leveraging it?

I want people to be rewarded for doing good.

• Return local tokens to those who solve local problems, even on a small scale.
  • Coins that can only be used in the region.
• Why does it need to be a token?
  • Cash is too expensive for utilities.
    • Is it strictly human nature?
      • Climate change against public assistance
      • Feelings of aversion to getting cash?
  • Wallet = Personality
    • Accumulate evidence in your wallet of your contribution to solving local problems on an ongoing basis.
    • This continuity will create trust.
    • Resources that money can’t buy
  • Interested in being a common standard.
    • Can swap.
    • How much swap is realistically possible?
    • A system in which a deposit is made within a set rate, and the person who wants it makes another deposit and exchanges it for another item.
      • Liquidity is likely to be low

Areas of Nursing

• How is the validation of solutions and measurement of effectiveness legitimized?
• Take lots of data.
• PSYCHO-PASS
• Fundamentally, who makes the assessment?
  • I thought you were a doctor.
  • In short, good and smart people should cull them philosopher’s politics.
• impact investment
  • Macro numbers → measures → how did they change?
  • Which number to use as an indicator?
    • What is the validity of that selection?
    • The public cannot judge.
    • Experts and specialists
• In local government?
  • We’ll start with DAOs and community participants.
  • Then there are the surrounding residents.
  • Affected parties
    • There is an incentive to participate.
    • I want to have a vote.
    • Reflects one’s will.
    • The right to reflect is a resource to be traded.
  • People in the next neighborhood will be affected, right? Can I come in?
  • Can we let anyone in who wants to come in?
  • We need guidelines to make sure it doesn’t spread too far.
    • Who decides that?
• DAO should be disbanded immediately.
  • You can break up every month.
  • Then, in the next DAO after a DAO that failed because it was too broad, it is easy to reach an agreement: “That was too broad, let’s try not to be that broad.
    • Difficult to make decisions in advance, but easy after the fact
  • If you’re not happy with the current management, just fork it over.
    • The fact that people gather in a community is a vote of confidence in the community
    • subjectivism
  • Dismissed when accomplished.

The question of who decides

• No one can decide.
• Because I greatly value those that are close to me.
• Unable to make flat evaluations.
• Native American and Ainu “borrowed from their descendants” philosophy.
  • Maybe a cultural system could be helpful?
• I’m not sure there is such a thing as a flat objective evaluation in existence.
  • Subjectively, it’s natural to give greater credit to those that are closer to you because they have a greater impact on you.
  • The person’s subjective view actually matters.
  • You can’t find it because you’re chasing a nonexistent entity.

Size Matters in Society

• The needs of the individual no longer match the needs of society.
  • Society has grown too big for its own good.
  • So the person making the investment is not getting a return on their investment.
• Wouldn’t a smaller community make it easier to match?
  • Small communities
  • Face size
  • It’s easy to notice mutually beneficial relationships.
• It is important for one person to participate in several communities.
  • You can leave a community you don’t like.
  • Being able to move to a good community is a vote of confidence in the communityMobileVote
  • But there is a difficulty in leaving a community that is tied to the land.

a matter of subjectivity

• There is a perverse incentive to vote for something that has no substance and looks good.

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/公開オフィスアワー2023-07-06 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.