from Diary 2022-05-26 Nodal Point of Thought 2022-05-25 Calibration Meeting Summary
-
Looking at a phenomenon A, “This is ‘subjective’.
- Isn’t this not good?
- You are taking a concrete smell of earth doing phenomenon and turning it into a bleached abstract concept.
-
“What, then, is ‘subjectivity’?”
- Isn’t this a strange way to ask this question?
- You shove all the concrete phenomena into a jar of abstract concepts, jumble them up, and then say, “What is this jar?”
- You mix all the drinks from the drink bar, and then you wonder, “What drink is this?” or “What else can I say except that it’s a drink?”
- When you mix things up, you’ve ruined it.
-
Specific Ex.
- When you’re trying to write something out on a sticky note, what size sticky note you choose is subjective.”
- Sticky notes are stationery, so use what feels comfortable in your hand.
- Sticky notes of a particular size do not have a magical effect.
- It feels right.”
- This is subjective
- feel of a brush or pen
- Some people put silicone sheets on their iPads.
- pen sound
- I don’t like the “squeak.”
- I hate blackboard chalk.
- whiteboard marker
- corporeality
- lingua franca
- feeling of being killed
- ‘If you say you are killing, I assume that means the thing before it is alive, but how is it alive?’
- Like a plant, it sprouts, branches, and roots grow.
- They are killing this by shoving it in a box.
- Live trees and square blocks of wood
- What good is it to be alive?”
- Developments.
- New ones are created.
- lingua franca
- A is X.” “Yes, X.”
- produces nothing
- A is X. Is it?”
- The fact that the two X’s have different meanings allows us to delve into what is common and what is different, and it increases the resolution of the world.
- subdivision
- Different perspectives.
- A is X.” “Yes, X.”
- When you’re trying to write something out on a sticky note, what size sticky note you choose is subjective.”
-
Some people enjoy having different points of view and others don’t.
- If the cognitive resolution is high enough, we can see that “each person’s way of thinking is different.
- They look “the same” because they are seen through blurred glasses.
- Understandable = “not recognizing differences in each other.”
- This does not mean “no difference.”
- Some people are glad there is no difference.
- Some people find it interesting because it’s different.
- Interesting” is subjective and a matter of personal values.
- Different perspectives are beneficial to creation.”
- The idea that it is beneficial to disagree with different opinions
- Is this another personal value?
- Diversity also includes “not creating.”
-
What is creativity?
- Is it creativity to paint the same picture every day?
- If Mr. A paints a picture every day and Mr. B interprets it as “the same picture every day”.
- In fact, for Mr. A, every day could be a new challenge.
- Mr. B just doesn’t recognize the change.
- It happens all the time. Parents say things like, “My kids are playing micromanagement all the time, don’t they ever get tired of doing the same thing all the time?”
- Kids are making new things and trying new things every day.
-
Can you recognize if you have creativity?
-
Is “creativity” real in the first place?
- Fun to make.”
- What we make helps society.
- The one who’s having so much fun making it.”
- Made of.”
- Does “creativity” itself exist that is different from these?
- Unobservable?
- I feel like I’m [Shove it all in the jar.
-
Convenient at first
- I’m going to put everything that is relevant into that box.
- A lot of stuff in the box is becoming a lot of stuff.
- They’ll start putting things in boxes in a messy way.
- It’s not good.
- I think we need to get it out and reorganize it.
- creative regress
- Massage to relieve stiff words
- Disassemble the finished Lego
- Calibration?
- Metaphor of sensor madness.
- You won’t even know it’s buggy.
- Difference between a box and a jar
- Boxes are cardboard boxes that you can put things in and then take them out again.
- Jars get mixed up with liquid, can’t get the original out.
-
The “human bug” also [Jumbled pots
- Human G
- Assuming a human is a bug when human behavior deviates from the algorithm assumes the algorithm is correct.
-
Difference between a two-person conversation and a three-person conversation
- With three people, when A is done talking, there’s a lot of air-reading about whether B or C is going to speak.
- I have a hard time reading the atmosphere.
-
If the conversation between A and B is lively, and the conversation between B and C is lively, is the conversation between A and C also lively?
- Not necessarily, the catch can’t start without someone throwing the ball first.
-
I want a rebuttal = observations from a different point of view.
- If it’s not the same, it can’t be anything else.
- certainly
- Requires trust in the other party
- Trust is an estimate of value
- Understanding different opinions comes at a cost, and if you don’t believe that there is value to be gained from understanding at a cost, you will not create the behavior to understand.
- Neglected, not paying the cost, through
- Twitter posts, countless, can’t pay the cost of all of them.
- Yes man = one who does not speak differently.
- Possible observation coverage issues
- When B is a yes-man from A’s point of view, it is not that B is a yes-man, but that A may avoid giving his opinion because, from B’s point of view, A is “a person whose opinions incur annoying social costs”.
- If it’s not the same, it can’t be anything else.
-
Is subjective estimation a human bug?
- If it’s “a human bug that makes it impossible to estimate correctly because of subjective estimates when objective estimates are possible…”
- But I don’t think an “objective estimate” is possible, there are too many uncertainties.
- If neither subjective nor objective estimates are accurate, then it’s more fun to do it subjectively, and you get more out of the fun.
- In this case, the assumption that “objective estimates must be made” bugs me.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/思考の結節点2022-05-25 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.