Long-term intellectual production policy - I think keeping a Large Network and as necessary start a fire (with flint, by rubbing sticks together, etc.) is intellectually productive in the long run. - First, create a knowledge network with [integrity - I’m going to add a little more and accumulate a little more. - Image of water falling and pooling from stalactites - It is important to maintain consistency rather than accumulate random information - Grounded in consistency - After Specific Needs are identified, take out Just where you need it. for that need. - It’s easier to decide whether to cut the edge of the network or not if you can see a specific need. - We can decide if we need it or not.” - If Objective is clear, then you can use [Is it useful for the purpose? - Clarification of objectives - pragmatism

from /villagepump/2022/11/21#637b73dc5e90c0000054586a

  • There was a “potentially useful concept” that was very exciting and overgrowth in one project.
  • The members of that project had a desire to organize things in a clean way, not in a messy way.
    • But no one could do it.
  • After a need arose to mention it in another project, a smooth restructuring took place

from [/villagepump/how about notation](https://scrapbox.io/villagepump/how about notation).

from [/villagepump/how about notation “enables the description of knowledge that can be easily reused”?](https://scrapbox.io/villagepump/how about notation “enables the description of knowledge that can be easily reused”?)

Thoughts divorced from concrete context

ref


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/大きなネットワークを保ち必要に応じて切り出す using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.