- Kaizen Journey P.24
I really like this diagram. I have been working on KPT until now.
What’s good about this diagram Arranging them like this clarifies the time frame.
- Decide Try=Next Action for the current [Problem
- The next time you look back, you know the result of that Try.
- Of those that produced good results, those that will be continued next time go into Keep.
- Stop what is not worth continuing.
- I like that it’s explicitly stated to stop.
- Those that did not produce good results are naturally accompanied by some kind of Problem.
- Problem can spontaneously disappear over time.
- Of those that produced good results, those that will be continued next time go into Keep.
So, I was inspired by this diagram and added some things. I had a lot of fun and painted a lot of things. I drew too much and the diagram was messy. Not good. Explanation:.
- Problem is the gap between Reality and Vision: Problem Solving Methods The problem is the gap between ideal and reality
- It is creative tension that pulls Reality into Vision: Learning Organization.
- Negative beliefs pull in the opposite direction. See: Ideal, Reality and Helplessness.
- Problem-solving methods consider multiple causes of reality and focus on those related to people
- Negative beliefs are part of policy constraints, constraints: constraint theory
- When Reality is a Problem, the action to get out of it is Remedy, and the place you want to reach after getting out is Outcome, which is a concept similar to Vision: PRO Model.
- [Keep corresponds to Again, Quit corresponds to Abandon.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/カイゼンジャーニーのKPT using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.