2022-12-16 @ Cybozu Labs.
- Flow of events up to this point
- Late May, planning for KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork starts.
- 2022-06-24 [Study Group âLet the Chaos Speak for Itselfâ @ Cybozu Labs
- 2022-07-01 Exploratory Net (Fireworks) Study Session @ Cybozu Labs
- Creation of lecture material: KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork_Lecture Material v1.
- 2022-08-19 KJ Method Study Session @ Cybozu
- Earlier, a study session was held within Cybozu using the same lecture material.
- 2022-11-16 Meeting It was decided that the lecture material would be a short version of 30 minutes
- 2022-11-30 KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork_Lecture Material v2
- 2022-12-02 KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork Held
- 2022-12-13 Beyond the KJ Method @ Cybozu
- Purpose of this time
- There has been a lot of development in the four months between the time of the August study session and now.
- Reflecting on the differences
2022-12-02 Day of the event
- Something pretty interesting happened.
- The only pre-assignment was to make 25 labels and read the lecture material.
- However, when I looked on the morning of the day, I saw that about 20 people who had learned how to do it from the lecture materials had started to make a net.
- Very active, proactive and good
- Has the fact that everyoneâs work status is shared in Miro had a positive impact?
- I went around with my comments as of this morning because there is no benefit to procrastination.
- KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork Pre-map comments
- In retrospect, this was a very good case study collection.
- Individuals are starting in advance and rounding up where appropriate.
- So many of them are in a âstate of crispnessâ and âstumbling handsâ compared to what I look around and observe in real time during the workshop!
- The only pre-assignment was to make 25 labels and read the lecture material.
- lecture - KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork_Lecture Material v2 - KJ Method Study Group @ Loftwork Zoom comments during lecture
- During the workshop, questions were accepted via Slack and answered via Slack.
- KJ method study group @ Loftwork Slack during personal work
- This was also very good.
- We were able to have 45 people in parallel, which is difficult to do in a physical event.
- Thereâs a psychological resistance to raising your hand and asking questions in a real setting.
- âWriting in Slack is less psychologically burdensome because you donât get so much attention from people around you.
- (The Nishio side is always in full operation, so there is a heavy burden.)
- Digital data so comments can be looked back on later.
- I have a record of everything weâve discussed, including taking screen shots.
- Itâs been a very good resource.
- The problem that people around you stop and try to listen to you when you communicate with them by voice in a physical setting.
- Since it was a chat, that didnât happen either (probably).
- This was also very good.
- Questions via Zoom + answers to missed questions later via Slack - KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork Q&A
Early, Middle, and Late
- Jiro Kawakitaâs ideas have changed over the past 20 years.
- This is par for the course.
- Jiro Kawakita was a smart man who could learn from new experiences and update his ideas.
- It would be even stranger if the idea hadnât changed for 20 years.
- But âthinkingâ naturally changes over a 20-year period, and the âlong time spanâ âchanging and dynamic worldviewâ was not well shared.
- This is par for the course.
- Three epochal books have been published at approximately 10-year intervals
- First semester 1967 âIdea methodâ
- Mid 1977 âExploratory Studies of Knowledgeâ
- Late 1988 âKJ Method: Let Chaos Speak for Itselfâ
- These three books were called the âEarly, Middle, and Late Periods.â
- This apparently made it easier to imagine Jiro Kawakitaâs thoughts changing and evolving.
- With a name to point to [The world that was a blur has been carved out.
- How was the last fiscal year?
- 1967 Publication of âIdeasâ.
- The first prerequisite is to have a huge amount of routine data.
- How to summarize the vast amount of qualitative data
- Categorizing and organizing routine data by homogeneity does not make it âcohesiveâ.
- How to synthesize heterogeneous data is important (p. 53).
- ~ and proposed a methodology for
- In Nishioâs lecture, to clearly distinguish the KJ method at this point, he referred to it as the âKJ method of the beginning.â
- How to summarize the vast amount of qualitative data
- What happened in the mid-term
- 1977 âExploratory Studies of Knowledgeâ published.
- He says something like, âI thought the KJ method was the bottleneck, but the bottleneck was not the KJ method but the interview phase before the KJ methodâ (p. 28).
- If the quality of the data collected in the first place is poor, the quality of the results of the KJ method is also poor (p. 29).
- He insisted that the interview phase in front of the KJ method needs to be improved.
- Expedition Net] is created by applying KJ legal ideas.
- What will happen in the second half of the year
- 1988 âKJ method: Let the chaos speak for itself.â
- Starting with no data, the idea of âFireworks to think aboutâ becomes clear.
- Positioning âExplore-Net-Fireworksâ as the âtwin brother of the KJ methodâ and the âpractical application of the KJ method.â
- This apparently made it easier to imagine Jiro Kawakitaâs thoughts changing and evolving.
- What does a quick birdâs eye view of this trend mean in comparison?
- Last term: large amount of information already exists âKJ method of beginningsâ
- Mid-term: Focus on ways to gather information
- Late: I generate new information âThinking Fireworksâ
- The basic premise of the last term was that [* a large amount of information was already available
- In reality, however, when I actually tried to teach various people, I found that the âassumption of a large amount of informationâ was not correct in the first place.
- In the medium term, it becomes âWe need to gather information first, right?
- What is the first step in the process of gathering that information?
- First do a thorough interior exploration and put into words what you think the problem is, what you want it to be, and what you think should be done to solve it.
- Itâs going to be that you need to be in a place where you generate new information.
- In retrospect, I see that âI create new informationâ was also done in the âHow to summarize a lot of dataâ phase of the âBeginning KJ Methodâ.
- Jiro Kawakita realized after trying to put it together and not being able to put it together (Idea method, p. 54) that it is important that he creates even when putting it together.
- This realization later became a system called the KJ method
- In other words, âputting togetherâ is actually closely coupled with âconceiving.
- Thatâs why the result of thinking about âhow to organizeâ is published under the name of âIdea Methodâ and explained in a chapter called âKJ Method for Promoting Ideas.
Any questions so far?
- How is the latter term âI generate new informationâ used in situations like mobile universities and fieldwork?
- If we apply Jiro Kawakitaâs concept in the mid-term, you say, âWe need Interior Exploration before we start the interview.
- There is a phase where I first explore my mind and clarify âwhat needs to be covered in the futureâ.
- Itâs like it became a firework to think about.
- Okay. Thank you very much.
- If we apply Jiro Kawakitaâs concept in the mid-term, you say, âWe need Interior Exploration before we start the interview.
- What kind of image do you have, Nishio-san?
- The former.
- Jiro Kawakita, who was able to do well and already had data that he had collected through interviews, did not understand that people in the world were stumped on how to collect data.
- You donât know because you havenât experienced it yourself.
- So I released a book called âHow to Thinkâ about what I did with the âdata after I collected itâ.
- Over the next 10 years or so, Jiro Kawakita gained experience in teaching by being asked by various people, âPlease teach me this KJ method.
- Then I realized that the data was wrong in the first place, and that many people stumble here.
- So in the mid-term, with the âexploratory study of knowledge,â weâre talking about âwe need to do a better job of collecting data, right?â
- Jiro Kawakitaâs ideas developed as a result of his new experiences.
- So âif you are in the same situation as in the previous period, you can of course continue to use the same method as in the previous periodâ!
- Jiro Kawakita realized that there are various situations.
- Okay, so if you get the interview part right in a way like the Exploration Net, then you can use the âBeginning KJ methodâ to summarize and generate ideas.
- Yes, yes, thatâs the image I have.
- Let me explain from another angle.
- Jiro Kawakita was unaware of the necessary conditions to do the âKJ method of beginningsâ the way he did in the previous period.
- As I was teaching the KJ method, I realized I needed good coverage.
- Thatâs why we built an expedition net in the mid-term.
- Jiro Kawakita was unaware of the necessary conditions to make that expedition net work.
- While teaching exploratory net,
- Before âexplore, collect data, and create a net.â
- We need to do a phase of thinking about what we are going to do.
- That is, in essence, the equivalent of what we called âinternal explorationâ in the terminology of the early-mid period.
- While teaching exploratory net,
- The âThinking Fireworksâ organized it into a specific methodology of âwriting a theme in the middle and placing your thoughts around itâ.
- and gradually moving to the front in the process flow.
- You need to do Y first before you can do X, notice the prerequisite.
- I see what you mean, thank you very much.
- The former.
let data speak for itself
-
âHow to put together data given from many outside sourcesâ is also important in the phase of âI create new informationâ.
- Some people make an incongruity between this idea and the catchphrase âlet data speak for itself,â which is often used as a catchphrase
- The reason for this is the implicit assumption that âdataâ is âobjectively correct.â
- Basic premise about âdataâ.
- In the first place, thought â[All data is a lie
-
All data is a lie. Use the data knowing it to be false. And from that, we can determine the more correct truth. That is the path to judgment. But how can the truth be determined from a lie? Because, from a different point of view, every piece of data also contains some semblance of truth. ([KJ method Let the chaos speak for itself p.71)
-
- What the âdataâ is called by the
- Observations and records of a wide variety of things
- Not âobjectively correct facts.â
- (ibid. p. 71)
- Jiro Kawakita viewed the data that way, based on this,
- Can I add my own thoughts that come to mind while Iâm doing the KJ method?â Answer the question âYes.
- First of all, [anything that comes to mind should be recorded.
- [If you donât record it, it disappears.
- What you come up with could be beneficial.
- It could prove beneficial later.
- It would be a shame to keep it only in your head and let it disappear.
- So we should record it first.
- I think this is the main principle of intellectual production, regardless of whether you do the KJ method or not.
- What you come up with could be beneficial.
- Next, we will discuss the recordings of the
- What is this?
- This is âdataâ of course, since it is âdata of my thoughts observed and recordedâ.
- Either you mix this data right now or you donât.
- You can mix it right up.
- You can keep it close by and focus on sorting through the data that came in from the outside first.
- Earlier, I asked, âAre you going to distinguish them with a mark or something?â There was a question
- You can make a distinction, you donât have to make a distinction, just do whichever suits your purpose.
- When itâs a âdecide what Iâm going to do nextâ type of firework to think about, thereâs not much need to distinguish between the two.
- I think some people want to distinguish between their opinions and the data collected when it comes to âcompiling a report that separates my opinions from the data collected.â
- However, in this day and age, if the data collected is digital, it is easy to find out where it came from by searching, and I think there is little need for humans to mark labels and do their best to distinguish between the two.
- First of all, [anything that comes to mind should be recorded.
- [If you donât record it, it disappears.
- In the first place, thought â[All data is a lie
- Explanation from a different angle from 63906b6aaff09e0000d221da.
- If you can draw useful conclusions from the data alone, thatâs the best you can do.
- Thatâs what we should aim for first.
- In many cases, however, data alone is not enough to reach a conclusion.
- Pinched before reaching a conclusion.
- Itâs like, âThereâs so much information out there, itâs a mess, how do I organize it?â
- Jiro Kawakita had trouble with this before he created the KJ method, as described in âIdea Method,â p. 52.
- Itâs not productive to dwell on âwhat should I doâŠâ at this time.
- Nothing is going ahead.
- Worse yet, âThere are some parts that are organized and some messes that arenât. Letâs just use the parts that are organized.â
- This is so bad.
- for some reason
- Where it was organized quickly, where it matched existing thinking, existing frame of mind.
- I was able to organize it quickly because I was able to rhetorical flourish the framework of ideas that I already had.
- Using only that and throwing away a mess that was not well organized is just reproducing the existing framework of thinking.
- No new ones are created.
- The seeds of new ideas should have been discovered in the discarded parts.
- And yet, you only pick up and use data that supports your existing perceptions, your existing frame of thought.
- Unintentionally trample sprout of ideas
- Where it was organized quickly, where it matched existing thinking, existing frame of mind.
- At times like this, it is useful to realize things like, âOh, I thought this was unrelated, but if I look at it from this perspective, it makes a connection! It is useful to realize something like this.
- Awareness = Idea
- Discover [New Connections
- Discovering that there is a connection between different assumptions.
- This breaks the framework of assumptions.
- Creation of new information
- Help with organizing.
- Because it reduces our preoccupation with existing frameworks.
- This new âawareness = ideaâ came âout ofâ the individual who was looking at the data.
- I think there is a relationship between this data and this dataâ is a subjective opinion that comes from the mind of an individual.
- So, if youâre trying to organize by looking only at âdata given to you from the outside,â youâre going to say, âCan I put that in?â would be.
- Both the data that came from the outside and the data that came from the inside â All data is a lieâ
-
They use data knowing that it is a lie. And from that, we can determine the more correct truth. That is the path to judgment.
- Use âknowing itâs a lieâ = âknowing itâs just my hypothesis with no objective basis.â
-
- How do you know if âjudgmentâ created in this way is correct?
- Verified by subsequent actions.
- for example
- They could do an experiment,
- They would go out for interviews for corroboration,
- Or look at the results of a hypothetical action.
- Correctness is verified after the fact by
- Itâs not something that can be solved by thinking on a desk.
- Awareness = Idea
- Discover [New Connections
- Discovering that there is a connection between different assumptions.
- This breaks the framework of assumptions.
- Itâs important to make your own decisions.
- In creating that âjudgmentâ
- The phenomenon that I thought to myself, âI think this has something to do with this.
- This phenomenon is observed and recorded to create data, add
- Thatâs what weâll treat as newly discovered and important.
- Thatâs how we arrive at our decision.
- Less unproductive time spent dilly-dallying at the desk wondering how to put it all together, making decisions, making decisions, and moving on.
- Jiro Kawakitaâs [Achievement of one job fosters both people and teams.
- In creating that âjudgmentâ
- If you can draw useful conclusions from the data alone, thatâs the best you can do.
- relevance
- Einsteinâs way of thinking introduced in The Intellectual Production of Engineers, p. 47.
- Axioms are generated by intuition from experience,
- Then logically specific claims are derived,
- That specific claim is validated by experience, thought
- Einsteinâs way of thinking introduced in The Intellectual Production of Engineers, p. 47.
Breaking the boundaries of existing assumptions
- This time, each individualâs work could be copied in digital form, which made it much easier to provide explanations based on case studies.
- Bad pattern that Jiro Kawakita criticizes in various expressions in explaining the KJ method.
- Like, âAssumed frame of mind needs to be broken.â
- For example, âDo not make an adaptation (e.g., of a poem or novel) to Existing Structureâ or âDo not make an adaptation (e.g., of a poem or novel) to Existing Structure.
- Do not classify.â
- stereotypeâ, âGroup formation is from small teams to large teamsâ, etc.
- Thereâs a concept thatâs been expressed many times in many different languages.
-
- 638dc07eaff09e0000900ff2 Case 4, Case 8
-
-
⊠You have a dogmatic principle of grouping in your mind in advance⊠The KJ method is merely applying the dogmatic classification scheme, and sifting and fitting paper scraps of material into the ready-made categories. In this way, the conceptual significance of the KJ method is completely lost.
- way of thinking p.77
- The top-down approach is to have a framework in your mind in advance, and then sift through the scraps of paper and fit them into that framework.
- Iâm talking about here in the diagram:.
- Iâm talking about here in the diagram:.
- Iâm saying it as of last quarter, Iâve been saying it for 20 years.
- But when you actually ask people to try the KJ method, many people do it this way.
- Why canât they get the message?
-
- Jiro Kawakita tends to use negative form instructions, saying âThis is not good, you must not do this
- You know, âdonât categorizeâ or âtop down is not good.â
- The result is, âThey said no, so what do I do then?â Many people end up saying
- Itâs an observed fact that there are a lot of people who make it this way.
- therefore
- To realize, âThis shape is not good.â
- Advice on âhow to get out of it.â
- I think itâs a good idea to tell a set of
- Case 4
- Whatâs wrong.
- The âhierarchical structureâ of âfamily > daughter > eldest daughterâ is strongly expressed.
- Iâve even drawn the boundaries of the group.
- This is a pre-expressed ânatural structureâ.
- It is rare that something new and interesting comes out of here.
- Why? - Existing Structure boundaries prevent the discovery of new structures. - The boundaries represented by this âeldest daughterâ circle get in the way of discovering new associations. - At the time a new structure is discovered it is weak, so it loses out to a strong existing structure. - Existing structures need to be dismantled.
- advice
- What is represented by this âbig circleâ is âthe group that originally had it.â
- The âboundariesâ on this one are obstructive.
- This is a concept that was originally in my head.â
- Letâs take it off.
- It would be good to focus on finding ârelationships that cross over existing groupsâ that are obscured by boundaries - [Note the line across the group boundary.
- If youâre afraid to erase it, copy it.
- What is represented by this âbig circleâ is âthe group that originally had it.â
- Itâs like I had the label âeldest daughterâ in my head and collected sticky notes.
- Yes, I also recently wrote about this being a Bad Pattern: Bad Patterns of Group Formation.
- Whatâs wrong.
- Case 8.
- This one has no group boundaries drawn, but the label is tasteless.
- Terminal labels such as âflowerâ and âsunsetâ are currently âtoo abstract a concept.â
- Concrete images are truncated.
- Flowers and sunsets, if they are placed side by side, there is essentially some relationship between them.
- I want to be able to describe what the relationship between these two pieces is by looking at the two labels.
- However, the abstract concept of flowers and sunsets makes it difficult to find a connection.
- When each becomes a concrete enough image, we have a chance to find the connection.
- For example, âfalling cherry blossomsâ and âa cold meadow with the setting sunâ could be connected by âsadness.
- Another expression
- Label is not âdelving intoâ, frivolous, greater duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza).
-
- see The Parable of the Floating Grass and the Trees
- root is missing.
- Instead, you need to stump your personal experience, sense, and subject as a firm personal affair.
- I tend to cut the roots off with a zap and turn it into an abstract concept.
- Some people unknowingly cut it off because they think itâs a good idea.
- Cutting roots should be minimized or they will die.
- s words, âLeave the scent of the earth as much as possible.â
-
⊠Itâs not just about the letter-symbol meaning, but also about the associative mood that surrounds the center of that meaning⊠Never youâre abstracting too muchâŠâ and âDonât get hung up on rigid idioms and jargonâŠâ⊠âLeave the scent of the earthâŠâ as much of the original material as possible. The minimum necessary âconceptualization processâ is important, and should not be unnecessarily reduced to a âconcept.
- Ideas p. 141 see Youâre abstracting too much.
- Itâs not just about the symbolic meaning of the letter, itâs about the hazy associative atmosphere that surrounds the center of the letterâs meaning.
- Never over-abstract.
- We need to retain the earthy flavor of the original material instead of turning it into stiff idioms and phrases.
- Conceptualization should be kept to the minimum necessary, not more and more conceptualized.
-
- advice
-
As for one-word labels, âWhat exactly does ~ mean?â or âWhat is it, for example?â and so on, asking yourself more information and adding to the label or adding a new label will make it easier to net!
- This is the Five basic questions ((6.2.4.2) Clean Language and Symbolic Modelling) in symbolic modeling, which I wrote about on p.197 of The Intellectual Production of Engineers.
- If Iâm teaching one-on-one, Iâll be the one asking questions.
- What kind of âflowerâ is this âflowerâ?â
- Itâs a flower.
- Then write that on a sticky note.â
- In the haiku corner of Prevato, Natsui-sensei said, âWrite that down!â I remember the part where he was getting angry with me.
- If Iâm teaching one-on-one, Iâll be the one asking questions.
- This question elicits âdelving intoâ and âconcrete imageâ.
- What is now an abstract concept, such as an abstract flower or the moon, will be made âproperly connected to my somesthesisâ (Properly subjective).
-
Do you have any questions so far?
- I know itâs not really essential, but what was the theme of this work?
- The theme of the work is free.
- I was curious because I felt that the way the theme is set is also crucial, as the specificity of the labels that emerge from the conception technique changes quite a bit depending on the setting of the theme (i.e., the theme itself).
- Well, to be precise, this time I said, âDo something for which the right answer is likely to be inside you, not something for which you have to go out and search to get the right answer.â
- Super difficult WW
- Room for improvement.
- For example, I wonder if there could have been an option âPlease collect things you find interestingâ ( KJ method of amusing , The âInterestingâ Exploration Net ).
- I do think there was room for improvement in the theming, the quality of the labels was affected by the theming, and people seem to be stumped by that.
- FreeâŠ
- Many people were so entrenched in the idea that there was a âright way (of doing things).â
- No, I said, âYou can use it more *freedom for whatever you want to think about,â and I asked him to bring me something to think about, butâŠ
- What was your goal in choosing âsomething that seems to have the right answer?â
- Not âwhat the right answer is likely to be,â but âwhat the right answer is likely to be within me.â
- If you bring a theme that is âsomething for which the correct answer has been decided in a place that is not yours,â I would say, âLetâs not think about it here, letâs go to the site and observe it.
- It is not a direction of consciousness to observe oneâs own mind closely.
- Iâd look out.
- Do you want me to look inside and do something that I might have the answer to?
- So. Maybe I should have been a little more specific and said something like, âSomething that seems to be getting closer to an answer by taking a closer look inside myself.â
- Difficult!
- Not âwhat the right answer is likely to be,â but âwhat the right answer is likely to be within me.â
- The KJ method case study I saw was on the subject of âWhat is valuable to you?â
- I see
- I knew that âvalue for meâ and so on.
- Like, âWhat do you find interesting to you?â
- Maybe I should have been more explicit about that sort of thing.
- When I saw that they put âobservationâ in the middle, I was like, âOh (>_<).â
- Youâre already thinking abstractly when you set up this theme.
- I feel that when you set a theme of âOkay, letâs KJ about observationsâ instead of something specific, I feel like âNo, youâre talking a lot have no roots.â
- Another example was someone who had a theme like âIâll have an anniversary vacation soon, what shall I do?â and I think that was a good, specific theme.
- Itâs, â*I am what I want.â
- The rest were deep in thought about âhow I will live my life.â
- I found it interesting in terms of the theme itself, but Iâm commenting on the âformâ of the theme, and I donât want to get too deep into a discussion of the specifics of the theme, so I didnât dig too deep into it.
- (Tip: In one-on-one or small group situations, I may be the one to listen to the âverbal explanation of the groupâs contentâ and then ask a Clean Question. I do not give my opinion when âteaching the KJ method,â but if we have a relationship where Undesirable Compromise does not occur, I may share my opinion.)
- I thought it was interesting that there was such freedom to set various themes.
- Iâm sorry for him in this case study 8, but I learned a lesson from the observation that âif you give a theme complete freedom, some people will rub you the wrong way in the theme-setting stage.â
- I needed to limit the scope of the topic a bit more and give some direction.
- PS: In organizing this Q&A conversation, I noticed that all of the âgoodâ themes included âI amâ and âfor meâ. It seems that âpersonal affairâ is an important direction.
- Side note: Keichobotâs value question may be a prelude to fireworks to think about.
- I see
Pre-conceived groups and lines across them
- On the KJ method creating âawarenessâ and âideaâ
- People whoâve been there will say, âOf course they do.â
- People who havenât experienced it will say, âI donât know what youâre talking about.
- There was no verbalization of what exactly âawarenessâ meant.
- This time, we have a clear, concrete example.
- Realization that âthis is something relevant, although it is placed far away now.â
-
This time, the action of âdrawing a lineâ was added to the âexploration netâ origin.
-
This led to frequent cases of lines being drawn between âlabels placed at a distanceâ.
-
This is âawareness.â
- Before the lines were drawn, I thought âthe two are unrelated.â
- Thatâs why I put them apart.
- But after the fact, I thought, âThere seems to be a relationship between the two.â
- So the line was drawn.
- The timing when this line is drawn is the timing of âawarenessâ.
- Before the lines were drawn, I thought âthe two are unrelated.â
-
What does the KJ method without lines do in such a situation?
- The way to express that âawarenessâ was to âmove it closer.
- This destroys the âpre-awareâ âassumed frame of mindâ and a new structure emerges.
- However, we tend to feel psychological resistance to this âmovement with destruction
- Priority is given to âobjectively correct,â âknown structures,â and âhierarchical organization.â
- Ignoring or downplaying my subjective feeling of âthis and that seem to be relatedâ.
- But that feeling is more important.
- Brain structures that I had in my mind before I saw the actual data.
- Assumption that this is the way it would be
- So this is not looking at the data.
- So thatâs what I thought before I looked at the data.
- The structure âbeforeâ looking at the data and what you realize is related to this and that âafterâ looking at the data.
- The latter realization is naturally more important
- We need to change the value system that says
- Brain structures that I had in my mind before I saw the actual data.
-
How about Jiro Kawakitaâs original expedition net
- I was not using a digital tool that allows me to draw lines of any length.
- The relationship was âclipped.â
- - let the chaos speak for itself p.307
- As a result, the only way to keep things relevant was to keep them close together.
-
By using the Miro digital tool, I can now draw lines from a distance.
- Can express ârelevantâ without psychological resistance, even if it is far away.
- This is good.
- The bar has been lowered.
- Information that âI canât verbalize in words, but I think itâs relevantâ can be recorded.
- Output, out of the mind, can be made indelible.
- This is good.
- On the other hand, itâs now possible to âleave it far awayâ.
- The freedom of digital tools has allowed for bad expression.
- There were a lot of lines drawn, and people were getting crossed all over the place and messed up, and they were like, âWhat am I supposed to do?â
- I couldnât have made that kind of crossing when I was expressing it with a clip.
- Lines drawn later are more important because they are ânewly noticedâ.
- You can move the label around to shorten the line.
- (Jiro Kawakita is opposed to moving it on a large scale. This is where Nishio and I disagree, and it will become clear in the future what this disagreement stems from. (Opposition to the Great Migration of Peoples], to be written in the future.)
- Can express ârelevantâ without psychological resistance, even if it is far away.
-
We can take care of the anxiety of destruction with âjust copy and keep it.
- Once the current mess is copied and set aside (you can go back to it if you want).
- Transform to shorten the line
-
- Concerns expressed by several people.
- âI thought, âI wonder if this and that are connected,â but can I just let that feeling sort it out?â
- profitable (e.g. deal, business offer, etc.)
- Rather, thatâs what theyâre doing.
- I think itâs connected.â This is what I realized.
- By connecting them and making them closer together, the words will later become âwhy connectâ.
- from The process by which the KJ method was created
-
When you focus on âhomogeneityâ and do groupings, you donât âget it togetherâ.
-
In some cases, it is necessary to find new associations from combinations of heterogeneous data
-
Putting together heterogeneous data = combining things that are not in the same group
-
- Related: 63906b6aaff09e0000d221ecQuestion 5
Does anyone have any questions so far?
-
This âbreaking the structureâ could be done in such a way that a human does it until the line is drawn, and once the line is drawn, the system breaks the structure for you.
- It is technically possible to formulate a spring model, for example, from the state where this line is drawn.
- If we break them down, it may lead to the discovery of a new human structure, saying, âThis kind of structure exists.
- Yes, indeed.
- In fact, we have tried auto-shaping with a spring model, and the reason why we are not doing it now is because âit is irritating when the auto-shaping moves the position while a human is placing the modelâ.
- Itâs irritating because itâs âdestruction in the makingâ to be moved by the system when humans are âexpressing by arrangement what has not yet been put into wordsâ.
- I see
- I just had this discussion and thought that if I had a âbackup of the current version so that I could go back to it,â then the machine could change the arrangement.
- Itâs not that difficult to reshape this with a spring model after all of these things are connected.
- Actually, Kozaneba already has the code to format it with the spring model, the menu is just disabled.
- Iâd like to see it.
- It looks to me that the green one in this case can be reshaped into a beautiful shape that doesnât cross if you take it to the right, and Iâm inclined to do that.
-
Iâm really curious to see what will happen here in the three rows.
-
By spring model, are you talking about a physical spring?
- You generate a force that brings you closer together between things connected by lines, and then you apply a repulsive force against this individual block.
- If you do iterative calculations in terms of physics simulation, the spring is beautifully shaped in a way that looks like itâs going to bjorn.
- You generate a force that brings you closer together between things connected by lines, and then you apply a repulsive force against this individual block.
-
When you put down the first sticky note, you put it down as you take it out, so itâs like deciding where to put that first sticky note, isnât it?
- Thatâs a tough questionâŠ
- You draw one line to make it, and then you take all the lines and shuffle them around and make another one, so you can see it on a different axis.
- Itâs probably hard on the human heart to shuffle it around and do it again.
- Oh, thatâs hard.
- Even if the structure is not good, it would be hard to say, âLetâs tear this all down and reassemble it from scratch again.
- Itâs like the story of the child who piles up stones on the bank of the river and the ogre comes along and breaks them down.
- But, you know, if you look at Jiro Kawakitaâs book, he did that, and I think he would be sued for power harassment if it were today. w
- Theyâre going to destroy it.
- He proudly wrote something like, âI told them it was no good at all to do this, and I stirred up a mess of labels.
- Terrible W.
- He wrote something like, âI looked at it with a sad look on my face,â but not in this day and age, like, thatâs not good, thatâs, like, w
- PS: After we talked, I checked and this episode is in Examples of Group Formation Failures. I went a little overboard.
-
I donât know what I would do if I were you, Iâd put it to bed and start over again when I forgot about it.
- It might be a good learning experience to erase, blur, or dilute the previous behavior from freshly forgotten and then start over again!
- And we need to talk about that âferment.â
- Itâs totally fine to leave things lying around that donât come together at a certain point.
- You let them sleep on it, forget about it for a week, for example, and come back to it after doing another job.
- Then, once you look at the Internet with a reset head and newly input knowledge, you will see the following.
- Iâm like, âOh, thereâs a connection between here and here.â
- Iâll say something like, âThat thing I saw on another job I was working on recently leads to this label.â
- So it happens that labels are added, lines are added.
- As the number of âexpressed realizationsâ increases in this way, we gradually begin to see a form.
- So I think itâs quite beneficial to put the net down for a week and look at it again!
- Okay, I can see that as a realization.
- Iâve given lectures and then a year later Iâm asked to speak again on a similar topic, and Iâve done things like reuse lecture materials and create other lecture materials.
- I have a feeling that it is quite beneficial to take lecture materials that have been sitting for a year, put them back together again in fragments, add new information, and reconstruct them.
- I can relate to that, and I do too.
- I only remember the important stuff and forget the details, which is a nice touch.
- For example, if you try to reuse something that is left in detail in the form of a text, and you try to reuse it well, what you had âbefore you read itâ will wipe out at the time you are reading it.
- There is a more favorable feeling to reconstruct from information that is so rough that the associative network of sticky notes is connected.
- In terms of reconfiguration, maybe so.
- It might be a good learning experience to erase, blur, or dilute the previous behavior from freshly forgotten and then start over again!
-
As for the first question When you first put down a sticky note, you put it down as you put it upâ, there are two ways to do it, as far as whether you put down the labels sequentially or not.
- What I really wanted to do this time was âjust have a label for the theme in the middle and add what I associate with it.
- But I thought if we did that, we wouldnât have enough time.
- So I gave him the advice, âWrite 25 labels in advance.â
- There was a sense that this caused confusion.
- If we were to do it a second time.
- Write the theme on the middle label.
- Prepare 25 labels according to the following procedure: 1.
- Create labels by association with the labels they are placed on.
- Draw a line with the source of the association and leave it there.
- To keep the shape of everything connected.
- I think it would be good to do something like
- Did you originally want to do a thinking fireworks type thing?
- Thatâs right.
- The real âthinking fireworksâ have a theme in the middle and are increased by association from scratch.
- But for some people, that phase seems to take a long time.
- Yes, they have to come out.
- There are people who get stuck, or who spend half an hour writing only 10 pages.
- And if that happens, you canât do the later phases, if they say there are only 10 sheets.
- So the risk is crazy high for a workshop with limited time.
- I see
- I was afraid that would happen, so I said, âPlease prepare 25 copies in advance.â
- When I observed the people I worked with beforehand, there were a lot of âpeople who were not connected to the central theme and were doing the KJ method that they were used to, with the theme in the middle,â so I thought there might have been a better way to give them guidance.
- I see
Parable of the Bicycle
- Itâs not something taught in words.â
- Skills acquired through repetitive practice in a safe environment.â
- Itâs not about whether itâs right, itâs about whether the bike moves forward.â
- This metaphor was further developed in the process of reworking the lecture material.
- To âmove forwardâ is to ârealize something you didnât realize before.â
- Pedaling a bicycle with the stand up does not move it forward.
- It looks like âriding a bikeâ but itâs not.
- No amount of that is going to make me learn to ride a bike.
- Actually, itâs not just the pedals steering wheel operation is important (see below).
- Pedaling a bicycle with the stand up does not move it forward.
- Parable of the Two Riders
- Why it doesnât work when there are seniors and juniors and [authoritarian gradient
- Itâs like a two-seater.
- Seniors hold the wheel, seniors pedal.
- Lots of two-person rides wonât help juniors learn to ride a bike.
- I have to hold the handlebars and pedal by myself.
- âI take the wheelâ = I make the decisions about what direction to go.
- I pedalâ = I generate the energy to move forward.
- The problem of âfast peopleâ who sass up appearances without much thought.
- Itâs like buzzing around on the pedals with the bike stand up.
- Itâs just spinning faster because itâs not under load ([Parable of the Gears).
- Doing that doesnât move you forward, it doesnât give you new insights.
- What was verbalized after
- Handleâ and âdecision-makingâ are equivalent to what Jiro Kawakita calls âjudgment.
- Achievement of one job fosters both people and teams.
- What is this âone jobâ?
- It is not âworkâ that you are told to do by your boss.
- To determine what and how you can get good fruit by yourself and do it.
- By tasting its fruits, you will become more confident in your âjudgment.
- This process is important.
- What is this âone jobâ?
- In other words, this is âdecision-makingâ in a âsituation where the correct answer is not given from the outside.
- No âthis is the way to do itâ given.
- People who are used to working according to a given policy feel insecure.
- When trying to compile data collected from outside
- The right answer to âhow to put it all togetherâ is not given from the outside.
- If the correct answer is known, there is no point in going through the costly process of âcollecting data and making a decisionâ.
- We do it because the right answer is unknown, and this is the basic premise.
- The right answer canât be given to you from the outside, so you have to create your own.
- If you work hard enough to do what you can assemble from the data alone, but you canât move on, then you need to make decisions to move on from there.
- You hold the steering wheel and make a decision, âOkay, Iâm going this way,â and then you press the pedal yourself to move forward.
- The right answer to âhow to put it all togetherâ is not given from the outside.
- This is how the âbicycle metaphorâ has become so matchedu
- In symbolic modeling, âsymbols have developed
- This metaphor of âbicycleâ is a symbol in a symbolic space
- Symbols have evolved and symbol spaces are now described in more detail
- I have it on record here that that is what happened.
- In symbolic modeling, âsymbols have developed
Do you have any questions?
- There was a bicycle analogy that said âpractice where itâs safe.â
- Just now helping a young man write a paper, but wonder if it is a safe place
- You need to insist on documenting the story you create, like what is the problem you want to solve or the contribution you want to make to this paper.
- If you donât have time, the teacher will pedal.
- Iâm thinking itâs not good for him, but I have a deadline to meet.
- I still need to do it where there are no time constraints?
- I donât consider a situation where there is pressure to âget to the finish line in timeâ to be a âsafe environment.â
- isnât it?
- Practicing on the bikeâ is like ârunning around the park in circles as much as you want.â
- I donât think itâs about getting where youâre going.
- grunting or groaning sound
- I think a âsafe environmentâ is a situation where you are only focused on rowing forward, and there is no constraint that you have to âreach the goalâ as a result of your rowing.
- Also, cars donât come along and hit you.
- Whatâs the comparison with is that âlearning the KJ method through on-the-job training by being assigned to a job received from an actual clientâ is ânot a safe environmentâ.
- There is a client, there is a time limit, and if you donât get it into shape and out by the allotted time, or if the quality of what you put out is not good enough, the client or senior staff might get angry, but âwhat is the right answerâ is not given.
- This is a natural environment for anxiety.
- Some people are able to ride bicycles because they are placed in that environment, but survivor bias.
- Side note: When my grandfather taught my mother to skate when she was a kid, he took her by the hand to the middle of the rink and left her there.
- Itâs important to note that the theme of this yearâs event is also ânot a work theme.
- Whether the results of what we do work or not doesnât affect our work.
- If you donât practice with those easy things, you canât do it with the hard ones.
- Like a child playing with clay.
- Without the experience of âkneading clay and making something suitable to play with.â
- Can you suddenly make pots and pottery to sell as products?
- You canât. You need a carefree play phase in the foreground first.
- I wanted to push for something like that.
- Yes, yes, I sympathize.
- But what to do in a âI donât have time to do that nowâ situation is a difficult question.
- As long as you are a student, you canât help it for having a paper deadline.
- I thought it was important how to let them play before the deadline.
- I see
I will talk when I have more time (planned). - Name the Nishioâs own style. - Bad Patterns of Group Formation
-
(I only talked about part of this page because I had little time.)
-
In 2018, when I wrote The Intellectual Production of Engineers, I asked, âWhy donât you give this intellectual production technique a name like the KJ method?â I was asked.
- I said, âI wonât name names.â
- Deliberately avoided naming names from the time of writing.
- for some reason
- This manuscript was written in 2017.
- I wrote the book thinking, âThe paper method is useful, but it has a number of problems, it needs to be electronic.â
- No digital tool had yet satisfied me.
- After the writing was done, we started developing digital tools.
- This led to the current [Kozaneba digital stationery to organize your thoughts
- I think in retrospect that at the time I was writing it, I had the feeling that the way I was doing it at the moment was not the finished version.
- This manuscript was written in 2017.
- I said, âI wonât name names.â
-
2022 KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork at
- I told him, âLetâs make our own style,â and âItâs good to exchange information about our own style.â
-
Q: name your own style and might be easier to distribute/exchange?
- And I thought, âThatâs right.â
- for some reason
-
It makes sense to create a lingua franca to share within the organization, but as a preliminary step, it might be a good idea to secretly give your methods a personal name (Personal words).
-
Unnamed concepts are like liquid, elusive and difficult to manipulate
-
Naming the concept allows us to manipulate it with a handle, like coffee in a mug (Metaphor of liquid in a container).
- The first step before creating a common language is to give a personal name to your method.
- It is easier to manipulate than unnamed concepts
- By naming a concept, you turn that concept into an object that can be manipulated and handled with a handle, like âliquid is in a container.â
- This is the story I wrote in The Intellectual Production of Engineers p.36 [(Column) To name the pattern.
-
-
Compare with 2018 decisions
- Writing in a book with a nameâ is the equivalent of creating âa common language shared around the world.â
- The 2018 decision ânot at the stage of naming namesâ is ânot at the stage of creating a common language.â
- Giving a âprivate nameâ as a preliminary step is beneficial
-
So I gave a tentative name to Nishioâs own style.
-
This is literally the method we use to create the presentation story
-
KJ method combined with [knee-swing (gymnastics)
-
Fragments of a story are told as stickies, and related stickies are connected to each other.
-
Sticky notes are placed in close proximity or connected by lines.
-
The ones weâve determined weâre going to talk about in this order, weâre going to group them in close proximity and lump them together.
- This is Kozaneba and can be folded up.
- If you decide to quit, just ungroup.
-
The process of sticking things together to make them stick is the equivalent of stapling in the Kozane method.
- The Art of Intellectual Production p.204
- In the Kozane method, when you think âthis is how the story goes,â you staple it together into a single chunk.
-
Roughly, itâs like starting at the top left and finishing at the bottom right.
- For example, a sticky note introducing oneself is placed in the upper left corner.
- If there is group work after the lecture, the explanation of how to proceed goes on the bottom right.
-
Most of the rest of the stickies are pulled into place by lines and stuff.
-
Why not start in the middle?
- I think the one by Loftwork started in the middle.
-
When creating lecture materials from scratch, we sometimes do a divergence phase with the theme in the middle, like Fireworks to think about.
- On the other hand, the real value of this method is when you already have the materials.
- Iâm told that there are past presentation materials that need to be changed in their structure.
- There is a âback-and-forth adjacencyâ between âalready written out sentences and presentations.â
- Already in a state where the connection between the material and its
- I use this when I want to reuse it.
- So in most cases, the material is already there.
- On the other hand, the real value of this method is when you already have the materials.
-
Can we have a general outline, like speaking in this order, and extend it from the upper left to the lower right?
-
Itâs a situation where the general framework is set but needs to be changed.
- When constraints, such as presentation time or audience prerequisite knowledge, change
- example - Create a short version of the lecture material - The process of converting KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork_Lecture Material v1, scheduled for one hour, into KJ Method Study Session @ Loftwork_Lecture Material v2, scheduled for 30 minutes.
- When we decided to do a 30-minute lecture on the one-hour version of the KJ method, we rearranged the materials and said, âWell, letâs see what we can cut out.
- For example, the self-introduction was about this much on the original slide.
-
We donât need so many, so we bundle them up and make them smaller.
-
In fact, in the final 30-minute version of the presentation material, the self-introduction was changed to one line
-
Introducing myself: I recently read a paper on image generation AI and its source code and tinkered with the contents.
-
-
You needed a connection to the next slide ââŠto promote multifaceted understanding by offering different perspectivesâŠâ.
-
elimination of conflicts, âI need to say âour backgrounds are much differentâ to connect to this slideâ and âI donât have time, I want to cut down on the introductions.â
- From a 360-degree viewing angle is important, because Jiro Kawakita says, âFrom a 360-degree viewing angle,â which is connected to the following.
I have three more names, but itâs time to go, so I think Iâll end with this one.
- Do you have any questions so far?
- Is it correct to say that âwe should create our own style of KJ method and share itâ is based on the KJ method?
- The concept of âbase KJ methodâ is pretty vague, isnât it?
- Where is the âbaseâ part of the âbase KJ method?â
- I have a friend who thinks in Excel, using cut-and-paste to collect and move related things close together (Excel-based KJ method), and I think of this as the KJ method.
- The outlinerâs favorite.
- Write it down in a gulp.
- The Outliner can fold up the tree, you know.â
- So, we can write a summary of the childâs content at the parent of the tree, and then fold the tree to organize the concepts.â
- This is a KJ method grouping, I think.
- I think this level of âessenceâ or âprinciple of intellectual productionâ is useful, but as for whether or not to arrange stickies in two dimensions, I donât think itâs a MUST.
- I donât think itâs always a necessary factor when it comes to âdoes it produce effects as a method of intellectual production?â
- I have not yet been able to verbalize when a two-dimensional arrangement is necessary.
- It is not yet clear which parts are the important essences for the intellectual production techniques to be effective.
- I donât think weâll know until we become more mature about comparing many different methods and talking about what the commonalities are in this and that.
- For example.
- Like the idea that âall data is falseâ and âby synthesizing false data, we can get closer to the truth.â
- Or the idea that âwhether a conclusion is correct or not is not something you can figure out at your desk, but something that should be verified through action.â
- I have a feeling that this kind of thinking is the essence of what is important.
- Not specific methods.
- I think that creating your own style is good for the person who creates it, but if you share it, âit would be nice if other people could use it, too.
- As more and more self-styles are shared, the question becomes, âWhat is better about method B compared to method A?
- If it is not verbalized, it will be like the idea technique: âThere are a lot of unknowns,â and âI donât know which one is better.
- I think it would be better for the users if there is an âessenceâ or âbase methodâ and the differences can be compared for each method, such as âI modified this part from there.
- I thought it would be very interesting if I could support the âbreakingâ part of Shuhari well!
- When I heard that, I thought, I guess we need to have a lot of our own methods and then we need to have a âMapâ for our own methods.
- I still havenât figured out what the âmain roadâ is or anything like that yet.
- You seem to think there are several âmain pathsâ.
- Also, the accessibility of the tools is very important when they are used by others.
- The KJ method became popular because it could be done with Post-It instead of âI will buy Jiro Kawakitaâs labels from Kawakita Institute.
- In this workshop, we used Miro, but I wonder if we could have done the same thing with paper before Miro was born.
- Availability of available tools will be a major factor.
- I hope Kozaneba can be released with a more user-friendly look, but itâs a bit of a compromise with my development resources, so weâll see how it goes.
- No, but I thought the overall message was something I could really relate to, so thank you!
- I didnât realize how important it was to âdraw the lineâ when I created Kozaneba.
- The best part of creating Kozaneba may have been the verbalization of âa line is necessary.
- Related: Why are lines essential?
- Indeed, itâs great fun to see that kind of trial-and-error process reveal the necessary elements!
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/KJæłććŒ·äŒæŻăèżăććŒ·äŒ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.