I think I started this story somewhere, but I don’t know where.

  • No explanation costs required for “quitting” compared to in-house projects or software development
  • If you are working on Project A and decide that Project B is more time-effective, you can immediately direct resources to Project B.
  • This isn’t a company or an individual.
    • It’s whether there are a lot of customers and other stakeholders.
gpt.icon Discussion about "[[path dependency]]": what is it? - Acquisition of new knowledge and skills becomes more difficult in organizations - This is because companies need a lot of explanation and persuasion when changing direction once they have made a decision. - For individuals, the decision to try or stop using a new technology has lower [[accountability costs]] because the decision is completed by the individual alone.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/怋äșșăƒ—ăƒ­ă‚žă‚§ă‚ŻăƒˆăŻæ­ąă‚ă‚‹ăźăŒćźč易 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.