from [/plurality-japanese/Glen in Japan Keynote Japanese subtitles#65aaa7faff09e0000559732](https://scrapbox.io/plurality-japanese/Glen in Japan Keynote Japanese subtitles#65aaa7faff09e0000559732)
from Diary 2023-10-14 old title Three Ideologies
HiroTHamadaJP I translated the three ideologies into Japanese. Political Ideologies for the 21st Century - RadicalxChange
Three ideologies - corporate libertarianism - Corporate Libertarianism - Entrepreneurial entities that seek to use technology to free individuals from bureaucracy, group organization, and oppression - Integrated Technocracy - Synthetic Technocracy - Believes that the evolution of general-purpose artificial intelligence and Singularity can solve the challenges facing humanity - digital democracy - digital democracy - Diverse, dispersed communities peacefully coexist to enhance collaboration
This is interesting.
- I thought about where I was, and I thought it was about synthetic technocracy 5, corporate libertarianism 3, digital democracy 2.
- It’s no surprise that Synthetic Technocracy is more than half of the population since they “believe that the evolution of general-purpose artificial intelligence and Singularity can solve the challenges facing humanity.”
- When I thought about how the other two were allocated, I thought growth was more important than avoiding an existential crisis.
- I believe that if earth civilization is the most developed option and homo sapiens civilization needs to be destroyed, it should be destroyed.
- Perhaps the optimal solution is the path that doesn’t destroy Homo sapiens, but it’s not up to Homo sapiens to decide what the optimal solution is.
- If a being smarter than Homo sapiens decides that the optimal Homo sapiens population is 100 million, then it’s right to do so.
- Well, it won’t be a radical “let’s kill billions of people right now”, because that would easily be met with a backlash from homo sapiens.
- I’m sure they’ll make sure that homo sapiens actively choose “not to populate”.
- As for economic equality, I’m in favor of creating a minimum floor at UBI, but not a ceiling.
- Against multi-person cooperation, since being multi-person is not the goal, but only chosen when it is beneficial to be multi-person, so “economic rationality” on the left side is closer. - Originality first before co-creation.
- I’m starting to think it’s 5:4:1 or 5:5:0 instead of 5:3:2.
HiroTHamadaJP And this.
Discussion in Japan
relevance - RadicalxChange x
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/21世紀のイデオロギー using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.