- The team performance is
- Not much correlation
- Average individual intelligence
- The intelligence of the smartest person
- Correlate.
- social signal Sensitivity
- Equality in switching statements
- Percentage of women
- Not much correlation
Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups | Science
Psychologists have repeatedly shown that a single statistical factor—often called “general intelligence”—emerges from the correlations among people’s performance on a wide variety of cognitive tasks. But no one has systematically examined whether a similar kind of “collective intelligence” exists for groups of people. In two studies with 699 people, working in groups of two to five, we find converging evidence of a general collective intelligence factor that explains a group’s performance on a wide variety of tasks. This “c factor” is not strongly correlated with the average or maximum individual intelligence of group members but is correlated with the average social sensitivity of group members, the equality in distribution of conversational turn-taking, and the proportion of females in the group.
This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.