- Empathy with vision” is the distance between a person and campfire (usually large, and for gathering and singing, etc.) (=vision).
- Some are near and some are far.
- Related: alignment.
- Diversity” is the distance between people.
-
Those “far from the campfire” are also far from this distance
-
But even between “people close to the campfire” there can be distance.
-
People who “don’t share the vision very much” are far from “people who share the vision very much.”
- In that sense, a situation where people don’t share the vision is highly diverse.
- The “low sympathy for the vision → high diversity” is valid.
- The statement “high diversity → low empathy for the vision” does not necessarily hold true.
-
Create a situation of “high empathy for the vision” and “high diversity.”
-
campfire (usually large, and for gathering and singing, etc.)
-
inspiration (for)
That diversity and values are different. I realized this when I was managing the community. Once you decide on the values of the community, you should also decide on the policies behind those values. You need to clarify what is right and wrong in the community. If you don’t, the values you define as values will be shaken.
The original tweet argues that “distant boundaries should also be clearly defined.”
- Clarify the boundaries that separate the inside and outside of the organization
- I’m not interested in that.
It is interesting that a single chart vividly illustrates that “values” (degree of empathy with the vision) and “diversity” can be compatible.
relevance - The bias of easy drawing - blind spot card Candidate
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/多様性とビジョンへの共感 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.