- Members who do not contribute to the achievement of goals should be excluded from the [[goal-oriented]] organization.
- [[community-oriented]] organizations do not exclude members
- We are expected to get along.
- These two “raison d’être of the organization” are incompatible.
- So, the only way is to create a Objective.-oriented organization inside a community oriented organization as a Duplex organization, right?
-
Maintain a broad, community-oriented organization
-
Volunteers from among those gathered there will form a purpose-oriented project team.
-
The Alumni Association is a group of people who are given the conditions for participation.
-
So there is no option to exclude people who meet the participation requirements.
-
Thus, community orientation is the only option.
-
gated community] because conditions of participation exist
-
- Project teams should be small for speed of decision making
- I imagine “up to 7 people” or so.
- Don’t ask for permission or approval from members outside the team every time. - If it’s a good idea, don’t ask permission.
- On the other hand, frustration occurs when activities are not shared with members outside the team
- Things are being decided without our knowledge
- Create opportunities for involvement in sharing decisions after the fact and returning feedback
- If you’re a person who voluntarily gives input and sweat, you can add them to the team after the fact.
- It’s Dual organization and legitimate peripheral participation.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/共同体志向と目的志向の二重組織 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.