- Members who do not contribute to the achievement of goals should be excluded from the [[goal-oriented]] organization.
- [[community-oriented]] organizations do not exclude members
- We are expected to get along.
  • These two “raison d’être of the organization” are incompatible.
  • So, the only way is to create a Objective.-oriented organization inside a community oriented organization as a Duplex organization, right?
    • Maintain a broad, community-oriented organization

    • Volunteers from among those gathered there will form a purpose-oriented project team.

    • The Alumni Association is a group of people who are given the conditions for participation.

    • So there is no option to exclude people who meet the participation requirements.

    • Thus, community orientation is the only option.

    • gated community] because conditions of participation exist

  • Project teams should be small for speed of decision making
    • I imagine “up to 7 people” or so.
    • Don’t ask for permission or approval from members outside the team every time. - If it’s a good idea, don’t ask permission.
    • On the other hand, frustration occurs when activities are not shared with members outside the team
      • Things are being decided without our knowledge
      • Create opportunities for involvement in sharing decisions after the fact and returning feedback
      • If you’re a person who voluntarily gives input and sweat, you can add them to the team after the fact.
      • It’s Dual organization and legitimate peripheral participation.

GesellschaftGemeinschaft


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/共同体志向と目的志向の二重組織 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.