from Blind spot card with no picture yet Does it have to be one?
If there’s no particular reason why it has to be one, maybe using more than one will solve the problem?
- Multi-faceted problem solving utilizing multiple blind spot cards BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED
1つでなければいけないのか？
2023-09-05 00:47
Summary of notes
. The notes from “Blind Spot Cards Without Pictures Yet” present the idea that a blind spot card does not necessarily have to be one. In particular, it suggests that problem solving may be possible by utilizing multiple blind spot cards.
Relation to Fragment
. The fragment “Stages of Resolution” is relevant to the note. The note indicates that there is no restriction that there must be one blind spot card. This is consistent with the idea, advocated in the “Stages of Resolution” fragment, that it should inherently be divided into multiple cards.
deep thinking
By not restricting the number and format of blind spot cards, it is possible to attempt to solve problems from more diverse perspectives. This reflects the idea of respecting the diversity of knowledge and perspectives and recognizing the potential of each perspective to contribute to problem solving.
summary of thoughts and title
. “Using Blind Spot Cards to Solve Problems from Multiple Perspectives.”
extra info
TITLES: ["Blind Spot Cards"], "Stages of Resolution", "Blind Spot Card Candidates", "Blind Spot Cards without pictures yet", "Random but not necessarily uniform distribution", "Examples of noticing blind spots from others' perspectives", "Should we add a series of pictures where two people say different things to a blind spot card?" , "The 'Obviously Good' Trap", "Mechanism Design Study Group"]
generated: 2023-09-05 00:47
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/1つでなければいけないのか？ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.