About Translation

  • In my plan:
    • Talk on Plurality Seoul
    • Why I am a Pluralist
  • Q: Do you think thereā€™s anything else beneficial for spreading the concept of Plurality in Japan? Personally, Iā€™m interested in the Gitcoin case.
    • my response to a survey run by GitCoin about ā€œfavorite public goodsā€, but I said language was mine

  • Q: What channel do you prefer for asking questions?

In Quadratic Voting: How Mechanism Design Can Radicalize Democracy

  • As is common in the analysis of markets for private goods (Willig, 1976), we assume there are enough issues and that each is sufficiently inconsequential that every voter has a quasi-linear ā€œcontinuation valueā€ for retaining voice credits for future votes.

  • I believe this discussion assumes that voice credits are intended to be used across multiple temporally dispersed opportunities.

  • In the case of Gitcoin, where voice credits are tied to money, this assumption holds true.

  • However, in the case of voting styles that grant 99 votes for one voting-event, the credits become worthless after that vote, lacking ā€œcontinuation valueā€.

  • I am concerned that many discussions about Quadratic Voting in Japan focus solely on the latter implementation, potentially missing the important essence.

  • Singularity and plurality are two sides of the same coin. [/nishio-en/Singularity and plurality are two sides of the same coin.](https://scrapbox.io/nishio-en/Singularity and plurality are two sides of the same coin.)

  • Diary 2024-01-01 ā† Diary 2024-01-02 ā†’ Diary 2024-01-03 100 days ago Diary 2023-09-24. 1 year ago Diary 2023-01-02.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ę—„čؘ2024-01-02 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iā€™m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.