2021-11-08
- If there is something of value X and an inferior copy of it is possible, then over time a degraded copy of it is made and the boundaries of concept X are expanded
- The degraded copies reach the āShoeshine boyā who does not actively acquire information first.
- So Observation coverage issues lowers the value of X
- This is Pessimistic Misconceptions, underestimating the value of X, so they donāt want to read the original source of X and canāt recognize the mistake
relevance - Usefulness of the classics - A good book X written by a smart person is copied all over the place by people of a later time period, degrading it. - People who canāt compete on the merits of their content put their name out there as a foil, saying, āItās written in that famous X.ā - People who read only a degraded copy without reading the original will misunderstand and say, āWhat a big deal. - self-development - Self-help used to mean good. - More scammers are taking money by offering degraded copies of self-help. - As a result, more and more people see āself-helpā itself in a bad light.
-
@nishio: the āperson with a high level of consciousnessā concept, I felt it was a kind of this after all
- narrow-minded
- when there is a legal tender currency, bad money drives out good money (Greshamās Law)
- Mass production due to low production costs of bad ādegraded copiesā
- Good contentā is expensive to produce.
- It is not reasonable to put out good content in a place where good content and degraded copies are equated, so good content will not appear in such a place.
- A minority is a majority among those who observe only a minority.
- Just because there are a lot of buggy programs out there doesnāt make being buggy right.
- A not-so-nice phrase, but simpler: āMore idiots donāt make the idiots right.ā
- There are simply too many idiots.
kmizu I donāt know what you mean when you say that āthere are a lot of people who promote object orientation who are kind of stinkers,ā but Iāve seen Fowler, Eric Gamma, Joshua Brock, and a lot of others. Iāve seen the discourse of Fowler, Eric Gamma, Joshua Block, and many others, and I think those who are considered ābig names in the object-oriented fieldā in the English-speaking world are generally āsane. ā¦
-
kmizu By the way, object orientation is a methodology (or some kind of framework), and at least no sane researcher should have ever called themselves a āscienceā. So, the perception of those who criticize it as pseudo-science is itself off.
-
Also, there seems to be an assumption among such people that if itās not science, itās worthless.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/å£åć³ćć¼ćåŗćć using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.