from Semantic Annotation as “Tax Payment
-
Now that I have a better understanding, I tried to output it in my own words.
nishio When human work is needed for AI (e.g. scanning paper books), there is a choice whether to pay for it in A: dollars, B: “points” that can be used for AI use, or C: cryptocurrency. I wonder why some people emotionally reject the idea that there is a choice between A: dollars, B: “points that can be used for AI”, and C: cryptocurrency, and of course there is a possibility that it will be C.
nishio This cryptocurrency generates price support through the customer value of “can be used for AI-related services”, which makes it more than a whatabout coin with no real benefit. It is easier to be established as a currency. And in the early stages, AI-related services will be in the form of “you can pay in dollars or in cryptocurrency”, so it’s a staple. - stable coin stable coin
nishio Based on the idea that “the underpinning of the value of a currency occurred when the state required tax payments to maintain the state in exchange for providing a service, which could then be used to pay those taxes” Based on this, the timing of the creation of a “service” that everyone wants to pay for and use is perfect for creating a currency Ticketism - Wikipedia.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AIのための作業の対価を暗号通貨にする using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.