- [ChatGPT and English Conversation
- Instructed to use [If an AI smarter than humans says, āThe optimal population of humans on the planet is one billion,ā what should we do?
Hereās a summary of our conversation:
- Topic: The response to an AI suggesting the ideal human population is one billion.
- Your View: You initially suggested that if the AI is more intelligent than humans, we should follow its advice.
- Ethical Considerations: We discussed the importance of ethics in decision-making, considering how actions affect peopleās rights and well-being.
- Your Perspective on Ethics: You emphasized a passive approach, where the AI should not harm humans but instead use influence or propaganda for population control.
- Importance of Non-Harmful Strategies: You highlighted the need for the AI to avoid harming people, as it could lead to resistance and inefficiency.
- Communication Strategies: We talked about the importance of effectively and respectfully communicating the AIās suggestions, considering the sensitive nature of population control.
- Inclusive Decision-Making: You pointed out the value of listening to a wide range of people to gather diverse opinions, overcoming language barriers to ensure inclusive input. This conversation showcased your thoughtful consideration of ethical implications and the importance of balancing AI intelligence with human values and rights.
Read back log
- I see that the filler and other subtle grammatical errors in my statement have been corrected at the speech recognition stage.
- Iām not sure Iām hearing some of it correctly.
-
Iām not sure, but maybe I think the group here can think more better than me.
- I thought I said something along the lines of āIām sure a smart AI can come up with better ideas than I can,ā but I didnāt get it.
- I wasnāt sure why the rest of the section talked about Collaborative thinking, but I guess it was because of this mishearing
-
- I heard that if you hold down the speak button, it will continue to listen even if you are not saying anything, but I didnāt do that because I was chatting while doing other things with it by my side, and it cuts me off with a blank after the because.
- Optimizing for this is going to get me in the habit of saying āehhhhhā or something like that.
- faltering is an important linguistic opportunity, so I donāt like the incentive to go in the direction of avoiding it.
- I wish this place was adjustable.
- With the current technology, the āspeech to text componentā creates the text and then passes it to the ātext reading AIā, which is why you get this kind of UX.
- Itās technically possible to have a system where the voice recognition results are sent to the AI as a stream, so Iām sure weāll eventually see an AI optimized in the form of voice input and voice response.
- Optimizing for this is going to get me in the habit of saying āehhhhhā or something like that.
- When we have an audio exchange, a muffled image without much information is displayed, but Iād like to see the transcribed content of our statement and the text of the other partyās statement displayed.
- Iād love to see VR goggles or something with this on the front and related materials on the left and right.
- About voice input
- I used to see it as the equivalent of text entry on a keyboard, so I couldnāt tolerate minor mistakes.
- However, when used for the purpose of āconversation with an AI that understands English,ā if the approximate meaning can be conveyed, there is no problem in continuing the conversation.
- So the line of āspeech recognition accuracy that users find valuableā is going down.
- I thought āVR goggles + communication in Englishā could be a form of āVR goggles + communication in Englishā not too far off.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ChatGPTćØč±ä¼č©±2023-12-14 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.