Beyond Public and Private Collective Provision Under Conditions of Supermodularity Divya Siddarth, Matthew Prewitt, Glen Weyl https://cip.org/supermodular
Expanding the 2x2: Beyond Public and Private
Talking about how the dichotomy in the public goods debate is actually a false dichotomy with no clear boundaries
The classic 2x2 classification of goods, pioneered by Paul Samuelson and extended by Vincent and Elinor Ostrom … It assumes two classifications: excludability (can an individual be prevented from consuming it) and competitiveness (does consumption by one individual reduce the opportunities available to other individuals). … Most resources go from private to public. Even private goods may be shared with family and friends or have small positive externalities (e.g., furniture in a communal house). Most public goods (i.e. goods or services such as parks or highways) are semi-excludable due to geographic conditions or access (e.g. lighthouses, fire stations, parks). These, along with most club goods, are also semi-competitive through depletion, congestion, and exhaustion (e.g., roads, trails, library books, golf courses). A more realistic concept would be to imagine contestability and excludability not as discrete measures, but as continuous measures.
It came up in this discussion. Explain why vote is better than money inn case of super-modular production · Issue #429 · pluralitybook/plurality · GitHub
This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/Beyond Public and Private](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/Beyond Public and Private) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.