When you have a group S of people, you interpret the characteristics that you observed that element X had as if the whole group S had them way of thinking. For the most part, this is just a misunderstanding, since groups of people are rarely homogeneous

Example

  • I hired a consultant and he came in not good, the consultant is not good.
    • For example, if you’re a new client and it’s not important to continue doing business with you in the future, it’s reasonable to use your business as a test bed to train younger people and experiment with high-risk methods.
    • It is merely a mirror reflection of your business not being good enough.
  • My former consulting colleague X is not good, consulting is not good.
    • It’s not clear why that X left the consulting firm, but with the “Up or Out” (promote or quit) personnel system, there are a lot of cases where people who didn’t get promoted leave.
    • I think what you are observing is someone who “didn’t stay behind”.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/人の集団を均質と仮定 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.