The work of KJ method, which is composed of labels selected by the majority rule method, ended up like honor student of well-behaved (of kids, animals, etc.) with trough of the moon (esp. in spring) and poor enlightening. animals, etc.)], which is also trough of the moon (esp. in spring) and enlightening poor, like honor student of trough of the moon (esp. in spring). --- Exploratory Studies of Knowledge p.162 When filtering labels for the KJ method, if everyone decides by majority, only safe labels that many people agree with will be selected, and the result will be every month. If you want to create something original, you should not do such a thing.
This reminded me of Generalists are selected when evaluated by sum. Since majority rule is to add up each person’s ratings at 0/1 and take the greatest one, it is equivalent to “rating by sum”. I also wrote in How to come up with good ideas that they should not be added together. This kind of averaging is useful in a school where the majority is advancing, but not in [A situation where the minority wins. I wrote about this in Average orientation is the worst environment.
Dot Voting is a common method used in workshops with a large number of people.
- Dot-voting - Wikipedia This is not wrong; the situations in which Dot Voting is used are
- If you have to choose one of several proposals
- Vote on a proposal that is somewhat cohesive. It is not like the KJ method, which is used for the material you are about to assemble.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/月なみで啓発性の乏しい、おりこうちゃんの優等生 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.