- When doing the Writing Method, instruct students to write down anything that comes to mind without thinking about whether or not it is appropriate to publish such a thing. However, in services where information is separated by public/private, this is disconnected. It is inevitable that ānon-languageā cannot be put on the service, but the public/private split is a design problem that can be solved.
Shouldnāt everything that is output go into the āpersonal/privateā space by default?
- This solves the problem of ā[šWhere should I write?
- Attribution of information āto publish or not to publishā should be decided after the fact.
- Information should be determined after the fact.
- Even if itās published after the fact, itās not moving to another space.
- All together subject to search
- In other words, not āprivate group/public groupā # False dichotomy
- A default private group that includes everything and a select group of publicly available items, the former encompassing the latter.
- Even if itās published after the fact, itās not moving to another space.
I was thinking about the design of Regroup. pRegroup2020
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/private/publicåę using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iām very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.