pEnglish2023-12-19

prev pEnglish2023-12-18

confluence of titles issue

• The problem is that pages is a list in Scrapbox export JSON.
  • Not aware of same title clashes.
  • So, once there, set it to {title: page}.
    • Current implementation
      • If there is a “ja” icon, skip it without translation.
      • If it has an “en” icon, it is overwritten.
    • That would translate “stuff that doesn’t need to be translated” that works but disappears when it’s overwritten.
    • Correct?
      • First, separate pages with and without icons.
      • For pages that do not have either icon
        • If the title is in Japanese, I’ll just translate the title.
          • If the result matches the existing page title, then we have a confluence problem.
        • If the title is in English, it is not converted in the translation and matches itself, but this is not a problem

I’ll experimentally generate just the link structure.

• /nishio-tmp-1219
• View in most linked
• Oh, it’s buggy, start over
• 
  • Mostly done.
  • Why is there no pRegroup or anything like that?
    • The page itself is there.
    • Uh, okay.
      • I have mapping data translated into English for Japanese link titles.
      • I’m inserting as a link what appeared in this mapping.
      • therefore
      • Links to pages with alphabetical-only titles, such as pRegroup, are not being generated.
  • Since there is a possibility that the English link may be broken during translation, should the English link also be subject to completion?

Title confluence patterns

• Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and Sapir-Whorf's hypothesis.
  • Both become the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis.
• This one too.
  • “Barren Debate”: “Barren Debate”,.
  • “Barren Debate”: “Barren Debate”,.
• A case of GPT3.5 equating the concepts I’m distinguishing.
  • “False dichotomy”: “False dichotomy”,.
  • “False dichotomy”: “False dichotomy”,.
  • “False dichotomy”: “False dichotomy”, “False dichotomy”.
  • Only the one that really refers to False dichotomy is wrong for some reason.
    • “Incorrect Bisection Method”: “Incorrect Bisection Method”, “Incorrect Bisection Method”.
  • Such ✅
    • “False binary choice”: “False binary choice”, “False binary choice”.
    • “False binary opposition”: “False binary opposition”, “False binary opposition”.
    • “False True/False dichotomy”: “False True/False dichotomy”, “False True/False dichotomy”.
    • “False dichotomy”: “False dichotomy”,.

It’s looking much better.

• Maybe they don’t match, because there is a confluence of concepts depending on the translation.

71 conflicts by translation

• https://gist.github.com/nishio/2a732b8b5ad9291bfaaf7603f362254b

next: pEnglish2023-12-20

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/pEnglish2023-12-19 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.