A tree structure is assumed naively, such as a syntax tree This is an infinite, recursive data structure But the human brain has its limitations, so in the end it is only processing for a finite number of patterns
- It should be representable by a neural net with a finite number of neurons. Even when placed in the human developmental process, we do not understand an infinite number of recursive constructions from the beginning.
- First one-word sentence.
- A naive way to output two-word sentence is a simple concat of vectors
- But it’s more than that.
- Denial, question
- No X.” “X?”
- Description of the target relationship
- A and B equals B and A.
- Denial, question
- It would be more interesting to consider such things as
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/有限で再帰的 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.