- Scaling disparity is independent of good or bad.
- A person making the assumption that “Disparity = Evil” can cause a bad “disparity reduction.” This is harmful
https://twitter.com/nishio/status/1344492182326001664?s=21
relevance - Raising top-tier changemakers - raising (the standard) - the nail that sticks out gets hammered in
words and phrases being slightly modified to represent something (e.g. change of language, etc.) - There are two ways to bridge the gap: remove obstacles in the way of one’s objective, raising (the standard), and take a step backward, hit the bull’s-eye, sabotage, and take a step backward, hit the bull’s-eye, sabotage.
- bad “narrowing the gap”.
- Unlike “increasing the gap between good and bad,” “decreasing the gap between bad and good” is misleading, because the “bad” is always followed by “disparity.
- It’s a negative word, so the whole meaning changes depending on where it’s engaged.
- The “good gap widening” is a beautiful Japanese I syntax.
- Which qualifies can be ambiguous.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/良い格差の拡大 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.