Why hasn't a consistent system of knowledge description method been invented?

• Software is a consistent body of knowledge continued

I wondered why a consistent method of describing knowledge systems has not been invented.

This question is wrong, and an artificial language called programming language was created and is actually used to describe for computer reading. So the “consistent knowledge system description method” has already been invented, and it is not a natural language.

• natural language, or a human-readable form, or something closer to it?

• Natural language is probably an inappropriate language.

  • There are mathematical terms and legal (law) terms in languages that use natural language and are committed to consistency, but in the end neither is readable by the general public
    • Because they don’t want to pay the training costs to read.
    • Most Homo sapiens don’t want “consistency in their knowledge system” so they don’t get paid for the effort they put into making it.

• Natural language implementation

• Programming for systems that are a combination of human and computer is required.

---

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/なぜ整合性のある知識体系の記述方式が発明されてないのか using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.