As for the question, I think the nuance was “Nishio-san doesn’t seem to be much of a Web3 person.

  • But my perception of name-your-price conference in the first place is that I don’t recognize name-your-price conference as a “Web3 conference”.
  • The “Smooth Society and Its Enemies,” from which the name is derived, existed before Web3.
  • The blockchain trilemma presented by Dr. Suto and this student may be Web3.
    • Still, in my mind, it’s more like “mathematical analysis of blockchain” than “Web3”.
  • There is no Web3 element in miyabi and his team’s presentation.
    • symbol emergence or something like that.
    • [Taiyo Hamada’s Funding the Commons is not tied to Web3, is it?
    • argocracy nor does the implementation have to be Web3, right?
    • Web3 people are looking for “new governance” with a new “world computer,” and some of them are saying, “Why don’t we just dismantle the current government and communication and replace it with market mechanisms on Web3?” and there might be some affinity between the two, though.

The question “why” can be interpreted as “why did you come to participate?” and “why do you intend to continue to participate?”

How did you come to participate?

Why do you continue to participate?

  • Because the first time name-your-enemy party was funny.
  • What makes it so interesting is this one word
    • Ken Suzuki: “It’s amazing how many people came together to make things with their hands.”

    • Culture of “No more ideas without implementation”
    • For me, this event is like a debriefing of the results of my unexplored project.
  • Another way to describe this place is early adopter group.
    • It’s a group of people who are willing to learn and create new things, so it’s a great learning experience for me.
    • It’s an opportunity to notice things you didn’t realize existed. - become aware of a blind spot
    • Well, “I didn’t realize how much Web3-related technology had developed,” and as a result, it’s a place to learn about Web3.
      • You can’t learn to search the Internet if you don’t have the skills to distinguish between good and bad articles.
      • I don’t know if I can trust people who know a lot to teach people who don’t know a lot.
      • It is better to intercept people in the know discussing with people in the know (but you will have to look it up later as there are a lot of unfamiliar words, like CBDC or Fiat).

Why do you plan to continue to participate?

  • Because so far it’s still interesting.
  • As a future projection Ungated, profitable venues are razed. to likely decaying in value.
    • Then Move the good stuff. things will be done.
    • I want to be recognized as A person who enriches a place so that I can be taken to a new place.
    • I’m doing this because I think it’s beneficial for me and the community to organize what I’ve learned and create a summary page.
  • Ken said something like, “We could call Azuma-san or Narita-san, but we probably shouldn’t,” and that’s probably because he’s worried that “the hands-off consumers” will swarm in and turn this place into a kind of devoured pasture.

This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăȘぜăȘă‚ă‚‰äŒšè­°ă«ă„ă‚‹ăźă‹ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.