from Diary 2023-09-04 Why I stopped putting 🤖 in the title of AI generated pages. Separate zones for blacks and whites to live. I thought it was a natural distinction, but then I questioned it. Is a distinction necessary? Initially, the AI will not be able to read what the AI generates. However, actual operation A human reacts to a page written by an AI. nature write inside That’s not a target for AI to read. strange
There is no assumption of a collaborative editing forum.
-
Thought stuck in phase 3 of [Evolution of message transmission
-
AI Dejima People’s Fear of AI
-
Extending the Red Link with AI AI will write for you what humans “haven’t written yet”. Shared Paths Public Roads It is unnatural to mark AI Less convenient for humans.
BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED
AI生成ページのタイトルに🤖を入れるのをやめた理由
2023-09-04 21:12
Summary
. We discussed removing the 🤖 mark from the title of AI-generated pages. Initially, this was to prevent AI from reading AI-generated material, but during operation, it was felt that it was natural for humans to respond to AI-written pages. However, we questioned the fact that the content was not subject to being read by the AI. We also discussed the lack of assumption of a collaborative editing forum.
Relevance
. This note is related to a fragment of Nishio’s research note, “Buried at the Bottom of the AI Page” The idea that it is natural for humans to respond to AI-generated pages and the problem of human thoughts being buried at the bottom of AI-generated pages are, in terms of information transfer between AI and humans closely related.
deep thinking
The issue of information transfer between AI and humans leads to the larger question of how to set the premise for AI-human collaboration: the original idea of preventing AI from reading what it generates was predicated on the unidirectional nature of information transfer between AI and humans. However, the observation that it is natural for humans to react to what AI generates provides a new perspective that information transfer between AI and humans should be bidirectional.
summary of thoughts
Information transfer between AI and humans should be bidirectional.
Title
. ‘Bidirectional information transfer between AI and humans.‘
extra info
TITLES: ["Buried at the bottom of the AI page", "Weekly Diary", "Diary 2023-08-25", "🤖🔁Boundaries between humans and AI", "Nodes of thought on Scrapbox and AI 2023/8/16", "🌀Boundaries between humans and AI", "AI s role in the process is important to clarify."]
generated: 2023-09-04 21:12
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/AI生成ページのタイトルに🤖を入れるのをやめた理由 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.