There are two seemingly contradictory movements that can be explained by the low resolution of the starting point concept, which, when separated, can be explained in a consistent manner on a different axis than the axis we are currently focusing on.
- In “From work to a task” in KJ method Let the chaos speak for itself, the author asks why there are situations in which escaping “work” is worth living for, and situations in which “working” is a raison d’être. The discussion of “work” is divided into two categories: “work” and “task”.
- In this figure, there is a movement V from A to B and vice versa, and a movement U from B to A, seemingly inconsistency.
- Appears to move in the opposite direction on the implicitly assumed axis X
- But it is from concept A [Low resolution
- Take a closer look at concept A and find P and Q in it.
- V is movement from P to B, U is movement from B to Q
- This is a movement in the same direction on axis Y
relevance - [Proceed in reverse, but the goal is the same. - Same name assigned to different things.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/一見矛盾する二つの動き using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.