• Why would anyone object to having more options for something they have already chosen?
  • Some people see value in the “sense of security” of their choice being the overwhelming majority.
  • When there is only one choice, the overwhelming majority choose the same one.
    • There are quite a few people who create choices.
  • The more choices we have, the more we lose that sense of security.
    • Because you’re confronted with, “You weren’t in the majority, you were just given only one option.”

context

onoholiday I think that people who live a reverse-individualistic lifestyle, who want to minimize their own responsibility by making a series of “choices that the majority of people would make”, are probably more numerous than you think. I think there are probably more of them than you think, and they basically oppose any change that would be like “let’s allow people to freely make multiple choices in this situation” because it would be confusing.

  • onoholiday You may think, “It doesn’t matter to you if everyone is free to choose,” but for them, the problem may be that they lose the “sense of security” that their choice is like “the ironclad choice supported by the overwhelming majority”. However, for them, it may be a problem to lose the “sense of security” that their choice is something like “the ironclad choice supported by the overwhelming majority”.

  • daitaohiwa It’s a monster born of reductionism.

relevance - People who are comfortable with a majority.


This page is auto-translated from /nishio/選択肢が増えることに反対する人 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.