A and B are discussing
- B âA is changing the subject!â
Conversation between C and D who were watching
- C âB uses the term âswitched,â but A did not intentionally switch, but simply âswitchedâ unconsciously because A is incompetent at maintaining logical consistency? Isnât this a case of Hanlonâs Razorâs âDonât find malice in what can be explained by incompetenceâ?â
- D: âI think youâre right, but by that logic, âA is just unconsciously confusing the two words because heâs incompetent at recognizing the impact of the difference between âswitchedâ and âswitchedâ on others, and heâs not intentionally âfinding maliceâ in what he can explain with incompetence. âNaâ is equally valid, so itâs a boomerang for C.â
- C âIndeed. By the way, the logic of âunconsciously hurting people because of their incompetence in recognizing the impact of their word choice on othersâ, boomerangs on both of us who use the word âincompetentâ on others without any hesitation.â
It turned out to be quite a grand boomerang.
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/ăăæżăăŠăă using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. Iâm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.